Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Thursday November 01 2018, @09:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the never-enough-chocolate dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Sweet discovery: New study pushes back the origins of chocolate

As Halloween revelers prepare to feast on chocolate, a new study from an international team of researchers, including the University of British Columbia, is pushing back the origins of the delicious sweet treat.

The study, published online today in Nature Ecology & Evolution, suggests that cacao—the plant from which chocolate is made—was domesticated, or grown by people for food, around 1,500 years earlier than previously thought. In addition, the researchers found cacao was originally domesticated in South America, rather than in Central America.

Archaeological evidence of cacao's use, dating back to 3,900 years ago, previously planted the idea that the cacao tree was first domesticated in Central America. But genetic evidence showing that the highest diversity of the cacao tree and related species is actually found in equatorial South America-where cacao is important to contemporary Indigenous groups-led the UBC team and their colleagues to search for evidence of the plant at an archaeological site in the region.

"This new study shows us that people in the upper reaches of the Amazon basin, extending up into the foothills of the Andes in southeastern Ecuador, were harvesting and consuming cacao that appears to be a close relative of the type of cacao later used in Mexico—and they were doing this 1,500 years earlier," said Michael Blake, study co-author and professor in the UBC department of anthropology. "They were also doing so using elaborate pottery that pre-dates the pottery found in Central America and Mexico. This suggests that the use of cacao, probably as a drink, was something that caught on and very likely spread northwards by farmers growing cacao in what is now Colombia and eventually Panama and other parts of Central America and southern Mexico."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Redundant) by requerdanos on Thursday November 01 2018, @11:29PM (1 child)

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 01 2018, @11:29PM (#756666) Journal

    Coffee isn't sweet, tea isn't sweet, dill pickles aren't sweet, cacao isn't sweet, dirt isn't sweet. You can add something sweet to any of them (sugar, honey, etc.) and fool yourself, but a little known fact is that the bitter or sour thing still isn't sweet--it's the sugar you added that's sweet. You are one of today's lucky 10,000 [explainxkcd.com].

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Redundant=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Redundant' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by suburbanitemediocrity on Friday November 02 2018, @10:16AM

    by suburbanitemediocrity (6844) on Friday November 02 2018, @10:16AM (#756781)

    The final product of a recipe is sweet, nit necessarily the individual ingredients. Chocolate is, or can be, sweet, true, but the primary ingredient, cacao, is bitter,