SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the weighty-subject-has-mass-appeal dept.
The future of the kilo: a weighty matter
First, the platinum-iridium cylinder is rubbed with a chamois that has been soaked in alcohol and ether. Then it is steam rinsed using boiling, double-distilled water. Finally, the 1kg cylinder is returned, carefully, to its resting place. Such reverence for a lump of metal is unusual, but has a purpose. The pavilion houses the International Bureau of Weights and Measures and that piece of platinum-iridium alloy is its holiest relic. It is the defining mass against which all other kilograms are measured. This is the international prototype of the kilogram. The IPK, in short.
Dozens of copies of this carefully calibrated piece of metal have been made. They are stored around the world and used to standardise individual nations' weights and measures systems. Britain's copy is kept at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) at Teddington, near London. But the Parisian version is the king of the kilograms. "All mass measurements, anywhere on the planet, are traceable to that one unit in the Pavillon de Breteuil," says NPL scientist Tim Prior.
But the days of le grand K, as it is known, are numbered. Later this month, at the international General Conference on Weights and Measures, to be held in France, delegates are expected to vote to get rid of this single physical specimen and instead plump to use a fundamental measurement – to be defined in terms of an electric current – in order to define the mass of an object. The king of kilograms is about to be dethroned.
[...] In replacing the Paris kilogram with units measured in terms of Planck's constant, scientists have had to push technology to its limits, though in one sense they are merely catching up with all the other methods now used to define the other basic units with which we measure our existence, such as time and length. These are determined today in terms of fundamental processes.
Also at Inverse and Physics World.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 06 2018, @02:08AM (6 children)
Was the mystery about why all the cylinder's weights were no longer matching ever solved? Or was that the impetus for the move?
(Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 06 2018, @02:24AM (1 child)
I guess I can confess now. That was me. I snuck in and did things with le grand K. Terrible things. Unspeakable things. Things that just wouldn't wash off.
It's good that it is being replaced. Good for all of mankind.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Tuesday November 06 2018, @04:38PM
Shouldn't you have ended that with #MAGA, Donald?
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 3, Interesting) by MostCynical on Tuesday November 06 2018, @02:31AM
from the BBC [bbc.co.uk]
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 06 2018, @02:38AM
Could you elaborate on that, please?
(Score: 2) by mcgrew on Tuesday November 06 2018, @05:53PM (1 child)
It's no mystery. Every time you touch it a few molecules come off. Over a century it adds up.
mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 06 2018, @07:11PM
Except some of the national standards (which are handled much more frequently) have gained mass relative to their initial calibration against the IPK, so a loss of mass due to handling does not, by itself, explain the observations.
However that's not actually important. The real problem is that, since the IPK defines the results of virtually all mass measurements, there is no way to measure whether the national standards have gotten more/less massive, whether the IPK has gotten more/less massive, or whether it is some combination of both.