Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday November 07 2018, @02:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the believe-it-when-you-see-it dept.

https://www.engadget.com/2018/11/06/fcc-caller-id-authentication-2019/

Even if you don't agree with Ajit Pai's stance on some important issues, you might still want to hear about his latest campaign against robocalls. The FCC chairman has demanded (PDF) the adoption of a robust call authentication system to prevent caller ID spoofing, telling American carriers to implement the technology no later than 2019. Pai has sent letters to the CEOs of 14 voice providers to ask them to conjure up concrete plans to adopt the SHAKEN/STIR framework, which would validate legitimate calls across networks before they reach recipients. That would block spam and scam robocalls from going through, so you don't have to be wary of answering calls anymore.

"Combatting illegal robocalls is our top consumer priority at the FCC. That's why we need call authentication to become a reality -- it's the best way to ensure that consumers can answer their phones with confidence. By this time next year, I expect that consumers will begin to see this on their phones," Pai said in a statement.

He asked the carriers about their implementation plans and warned that if it doesn't seem like the call authentication system is on track to get up and running by 2019, the FCC will take action. Pai didn't elaborate on what the FCC will do, but the agency says it "stands ready to ensure widespread deployment to hit this important technological milestone."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday November 07 2018, @11:50PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday November 07 2018, @11:50PM (#759223)

    But, can you prove that it really was candidate X, or was it one of their opponents trying to make them look bad?

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by etherscythe on Thursday November 08 2018, @01:02AM (1 child)

    by etherscythe (937) on Thursday November 08 2018, @01:02AM (#759245) Journal

    ...or Russian hackers looking to have a laugh and stir up a little political mischief.

    --
    "Fake News: anything reported outside of my own personally chosen echo chamber"
    • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Thursday November 08 2018, @02:21PM

      by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday November 08 2018, @02:21PM (#759364) Journal

      Might be inclined to believe that were possible if I wasn't seeing the same behavior from politicians and their campaigns in person too. Just this week I had to report a local candidate to the election commission for illegal electioneering -- standing right in front of the door to the polling place accosting every single voter entering with campaign material and such. I reported that to the election commission, who confirmed that it was illegal and assured me that they'd do something about it...but later that night I checked back and they were still there.