Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday November 14 2018, @05:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the How-did-they-get-all-that-money? dept.

Nintendo wins $12m lawsuit against ROM sites run by a married couple

Nintendo has won a legal battle against pirate ROM websites LoveROMS.com and LoveRETRO.co. The judgement from the Arizona court has resulted in the owners of the now-defunct sites having to pay the Japanese game developer $12.23 million in damages.

The ROM site owners are married couple Jacob and Cristian Mathias, who registered the two sites under their company, Mathias Designs. Their legal troubles started this past summer when Nintendo filed a complaint with the federal court against them. In order to avoid a drawn-out legal battle the couple took down the two websites in July and put up a notice that said they were under maintenance.

As TorrentFreak notes, however, the couple soon owned up and admitted to both direct and indirect copyright as well as trademark infringement of Nintendo's games and other copyrighted content. The two ROM sites the Mathias couple ran offered pirated copies of Nintendo's retro games, including Super Mario World, Mario Kart 64, Super Mario All-Stars, and many more. People were able to download these pirate copies and play them on PC and other platforms they weren't intended for with an emulator, thereby bypassing Nintendo's hardware ecosystem entirely.

As the paperwork obtained by TorrentFreak shows, both parties – the Mathias couple and Nintendo – have now reached an agreement after the dispute was raised this summer.

Also at Motherboard.

Previously: Nintendo Sues ROM Sites
EmuParadise Removes ROMs After Nintendo Sued Other ROM Sites


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 15 2018, @10:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 15 2018, @10:27AM (#762101)

    It seems fucked up that the law doesn't actually specify what is and isn't illegal precisely enough that a lawyer can tell prior to a court judgment.

    Ah, if the laws were so clearly defined, then there'd be no need for lawyers...
    I'll preface this with, of course, IANAL, but I've had to employ them on a number of occasions over the past decade and I've had to trawl through thousands of pages of legal documentation. If you look hard, there's always something in the wording used in a law, some ambiguous word or phrase, which allows for some degree of lawyerly 'wiggle' and a future judicial precedent. I've been told that some of the legal tribe specialise in trawling through the wording of all enacted laws looking for these exploitable loopholes that others of the legal tribe seem to specialise in surreptitiously introducing..