Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Thursday November 15 2018, @08:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the masaka! dept.

System error: Japan cybersecurity minister admits he has never used a computer

A Japanese minister in charge of cybersecurity has provoked astonishment by admitting he has never used a computer in his professional life, and appearing confused by the concept of a USB drive. Yoshitaka Sakurada, 68, is the deputy chief of the government's cybersecurity strategy office and also the minister in charge of the Olympic and Paralympic Games that Tokyo will host in 2020.

In parliament on Wednesday however, he admitted he doesn't use computers. "Since the age of 25, I have instructed my employees and secretaries, so I don't use computers myself," he said in a response to an opposition question in a lower house session, local media reported.

He also appeared confused by the question when asked about whether USB drives were in use at Japanese nuclear facilities. His comments were met with incredulity by opposition lawmakers. "It's unbelievable that someone who has not touched computers is responsible for cybersecurity policies," said opposition lawmaker Masato Imai.

And his comments provoked a firestorm online. "Doesn't he feel ashamed?" wrote one Twitter user. "Today any company president uses a PC. He doesn't even know what a USB is. Holy cow."

Another joked that perhaps Sakurada was simply engaged in his own kind of cybersecurity. "If a hacker targets this Minister Sakurada, they wouldn't be able to steal any information. Indeed it might be the strongest kind of security!"

Also at NYT, The Register, and Reuters.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 15 2018, @10:06PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 15 2018, @10:06PM (#762371)

    Fully agreed that somebody who is "a good manager and leader but bad technical skills" is better in this role than somebody who is "technically adept but bad with people." On the other hand, I think everybody would agree that it's better to have somebody who is both technically adept (or at least knowledgeable) as well as a good people-person.

    With something as high-profile as this, I don't see why they couldn't have found somebody who was both. seeing how they didn't, because really who doesn't have some experience with computers now-a-days, the question becomes why did they select him?

    To cut through the coy veneer of allusions and insinuations to the real heart of the matter... is this person qualified for his role, and is there government corruption going on here?

    I suspect the answer is semi-qualified, and yes-corruption, but I'd need a lot more information to be positive.

    (Note, I say the same for many of the officials appointed to the Trump administration, when they seem to lack basic credentials related to their departments.)