Free press isn't free under White House's onerous rules (Editorial)
Muzzling the press is chapter one in the authoritarian ruler's playbook. By the Founders' design, the president of the United States is not a king or dictator. He doesn't control the media, or get to decide which reporters are assigned to cover him.
A free press isn't free if the government imposes rules on what reporters can ask and how they must ask it. That violates the First Amendment. Period.
Banning reporters from asking follow-up questions or challenging the president's statements, under threat of taking away their access to the White House, hobbles the watchdog function of the media. White House reporters will be looking over their shoulders, calibrating the consequences, every time they ask tough questions. Meanwhile, the president will be able to dodge accountability and lie to the American people with even more impunity.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by DeVilla on Saturday November 24 2018, @09:43PM
Isn't Politifact the site that said "If you like your doctor/insurance you can keep your doctor." was pretty much true in 2008-ish only to eventually back-pedal and until it became "pant's on fire" false by 2013, while not taking down or updating the 2008 article still calling it true?
I'm afraid I don't buy someone throwing around numbers from Poiltifact as though they were some kind of objective truth.