The Journal of Controversial Ideas is already, well, controversial. Here's a founder's defense.
News broke last week that philosophers Jeff McMahan, Peter Singer, and Francesca Minerva are planning to start a publication called the Journal of Controversial Ideas, an interdisciplinary academic outlet where scholars will be allowed to present arguments and findings pseudonymously, without fear of damaging their reputation.
Almost immediately, the journal was cast as another volley in the wars over free speech and political correctness on college campuses. Critics mocked it as an attempt by white, privileged academics (while Minerva is a postdoc, Singer and McMahan are both among the most prominent applied ethicists in philosophy) to smuggle reactionary and bigoted views that academics would not feel comfortable airing under their own names. Not helping matters was McMahan's declaration to a reporter that he would be open to publishing an article defending eugenics, if its arguments were of sufficient quality.
"Essentially, it is a safe space, one where authors do not have to deal with feedback or criticism from those at the sharp end of their 'controversial' ideas," Nesrine Malik warned of the journal in a Guardian column. "It is publishing without the responsibility that comes along with that."
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 24 2018, @01:37AM (1 child)
I introduce you to how Hillary Clinton decides to talk to people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oydpekP3F8w [youtube.com]
There is no debate anymore. Just barking.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 24 2018, @05:43AM
It's a sign of imminent social collapse driven by the exploitation of the working class under capitalism. The upcoming period of turmoil will also be a period when a genuine socialist revolution becomes possible. Capitalism is not a sustainable system.