Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday November 26 2018, @04:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the slippery-slope-became-a-cliff dept.

Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry

A Chinese scientist claims that he has helped make the world's first genome-edited babies — twin girls who were born this month. The announcement has provoked shock, and some outrage, among scientists around the world.

He Jiankui, a genome-editing researcher from the Southern University of Science and Technology of China in Shenzhen, says that he implanted into a woman an embryo that had been edited to disable the genetic pathway that allows a cell to be infected with HIV.

In a video posted to YouTube, He says the girls are healthy and now at home with their parents. Genome sequencing of their DNA has shown that the editing worked, and only altered the gene they targeted, he says.

The scientist's claims have not been verified through independent genome testing or published in a peer-reviewed journal. But, if true, the birth would represent a significant — and controversial — leap in the use of genome-editing. So far these tools have only be used in embryos for research, often to investigate the benefit of using them to eliminate disease-causing mutations from the human germline. But reports of off-target effects in some studies have raised significant safety concerns.

Documents posted on China's clinical trial registry show that He used the ubiquitous CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing tool to disable a gene called CCR5, which forms a protein that allows HIV to enter a cell. Genome-editing scientist Fyodor Urnov was asked to review documents that described DNA sequence analysis of human embryos and fetuses gene-edited at the CCR5 locus for an article in MIT Technology Review. "The data I reviewed are consistent with the fact that the editing has, in fact, taken place," says Urnov, from the Altius Institute for Biomedical Sciences in Seattle. But he says the only way to tell if the children's genomes have been edited is to independently test their DNA.

Also at STAT News:

The Chinese university where He is an associate professor issued a statement saying that it had been unaware of his research project and that He had been on leave without pay since February, Reuters reported. The work is a "serious violation of academic ethics and standards," Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen said in the statement. The university said it would immediately launch an investigation.

See also: As a genome editing summit opens in Hong Kong, questions abound over China, and why it quietly bowed out


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @04:59PM (8 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @04:59PM (#766492)

    Quartz had a good article on the ethics:
    https://qz.com/1474384/chinas-gene-edited-crispr-babies-push-bioethics-into-a-dark-new-era/ [qz.com]

    Life is starting to resemble a science fiction novel. Expect designer babies in a year or two. Who knows, we may even need smarter people to complete with the robots for jobs.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Monday November 26 2018, @05:09PM (7 children)

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Monday November 26 2018, @05:09PM (#766499) Journal

    Who knows, we may even need smarter people to complete with the robots for jobs.

    If we end up going down that path, expect the robots to win very quickly. That is, unless those "smarter people" are also altered to reach productive maturity in a vastly accelerated time-frame - hard to compete with a robot that's available NOW when your superbaby is still 17 years from entering the workforce. Well, unless this genetic meddling allows us to skip all that tedious mucking about with childhood and cultivate full-grown adult humans, Blade Runner style. But then you get into the "other than the chemistry that runs them, what's the difference between this robot slave and that meat-slave?" territory. Which then leads us back to "if we can get robot slaves to do all this damn work for us, why are we competing for their jobs rather than simply enjoying the fruits of their labour?" At which point somebody posts a link to Manny.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @05:18PM (5 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @05:18PM (#766503)

      Or are engineered to be able to actually foresee and care about the consequences of such technological advances.

      It's a scary time now when there's so little control over technological advances that may not be undoable if something goes wrong. We've already got GMOs spreading in the wild because the corporations that paid for the research were too cheap to use proper containment strategies. Also, because the legal system allows them to claim infringement when the genes migrate into nearby fields.

      It's a shame that so many of these people didn't seen Jurassic Park. The question shouldn't be whether or not we can do some of these things, it should be whether or not we should. There's an enormous amount of responsibility that comes from being able to purposefully design organisms in ways that aren't natural.

      • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @05:43PM (4 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @05:43PM (#766513)

        It would be plenty enough if the edited genome makes humans immune to many, if not all, diseases1. This hand-wringing of "ethicists" is similar to earlier prohibition to learn human body, then the mass refusal to vaccinate... when one man invents a better human, can you imagine how many medical specialists would love to have him hanged and quartered? Their welfare depends on having a steady stream of patients, after all. Just as an example, how much would you pay for a feature to grow your own replacement teeth? This already works in humans - but only once, and then some switch flips and the process stops.

        [1] A. Strugatsky, B. Strugatsky, Inhabited Island [wikipedia.org]

        • (Score: 4, Insightful) by HiThere on Monday November 26 2018, @05:55PM (3 children)

          by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 26 2018, @05:55PM (#766517) Journal

          The problem with patching vulnerabilities is that those same capabilities are often used by other features. With evolution expect this to be a *LOT* worse. But if the features are late developing, or subtle, it may be hard to tell what is broken.

          E.g., one problem with iron is that there's no excretion mechanism, so it's easy to overdose. The obvious fix is to excrete it into the intestines, possibly in the bile fluids. Unfortunately, removing iron from an area is one way the body controls growth of microorganisms. Whoops! There was a reason there was no way to excrete it.

          --
          Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @06:07PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 26 2018, @06:07PM (#766524)
            A seriously contrived example. Resistance to poisons will take a long time to engineer; you likely will need new ferments to chemically transform unwanted substances into something else, not as harmful. In the article the researcher prevented a deadly, untreatable, pretty common disease. He should get a Nobel prize for that.
          • (Score: 3, Touché) by khallow on Monday November 26 2018, @07:35PM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 26 2018, @07:35PM (#766566) Journal

            E.g., one problem with iron is that there's no excretion mechanism

            Bleeding.

          • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Magic Oddball on Tuesday November 27 2018, @11:15PM

            by Magic Oddball (3847) on Tuesday November 27 2018, @11:15PM (#767078) Journal

            Another good example would be the natural genetic immunity to malaria caused by a minor alteration to the shape of a red blood cell, which seems like a wonderful development until you consider that inheriting the immunity from both parents causes sickle cell disease [wikipedia.org].

            There's also the many inherited genetic immune disorders that we still don't fully understand and still can't cure. Anyone with an urge to fuck with the genetics behind the human immune system (or who doesn't see why it's an ethical minefield) should spend some time assisting a variety of people who have developed multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, or the many other severe genetic immune disorders.

    • (Score: 2) by legont on Tuesday November 27 2018, @02:43AM

      by legont (4179) on Tuesday November 27 2018, @02:43AM (#766776)

      The plan is to eventually alter the genome of living organisms. In fact most of the "bosses" plan to be around forever. That's probably where Mask's plans to go to Mars himself come from.

      --
      "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.