Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday November 27 2018, @11:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the beat-it,-don't-eat-it dept.

Phys.org:

Dr. Helen Harwatt, farmed animal law and policy fellow at Harvard Law School, advises that getting protein from plant sources instead of animal sources would drastically help in meeting climate targets and reduce the risk of overshooting temperature goals.

For the first time, Dr. Harwatt proposes a three-step strategy to gradually replace animal proteins with plant-sourced proteins, as part of the commitment to mitigate climate change. These are:

1) Acknowledging that current numbers of livestock are at their peak and will need to decline ('peak livestock').

2) Set targets to transition away from livestock products starting with foods linked with the highest greenhouse gas emissions such as beef, then cow's milk and pig meat ('worst-first' approach).

3) Assessing suitable replacement products against a range of criteria including greenhouse gas emission targets, land usage, and public health benefits ('best available food' approach).

Harwatt further elaborates that recent evidence shows, in comparison with the current food system, switching from animals to plants proteins, could potentially feed an additional 350 million people in the US alone.

You can eat plants or insects, but not meat.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Wednesday November 28 2018, @04:00AM (5 children)

    by Sulla (5173) on Wednesday November 28 2018, @04:00AM (#767190) Journal

    Anyone in the US making more than 35k/year is in the top 1% of the world.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by NewNic on Wednesday November 28 2018, @05:24AM (4 children)

    by NewNic (6420) on Wednesday November 28 2018, @05:24AM (#767215) Journal

    Anyone in the US making more than 35k/year is in the top 1% of the world.

    Now adjust that for cost of living.

    --
    lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28 2018, @06:17AM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28 2018, @06:17AM (#767232)

      How else can Sulla give us our first world guilt? The irony is amusing.

      • (Score: 1, Disagree) by Sulla on Wednesday November 28 2018, @05:54PM (2 children)

        by Sulla (5173) on Wednesday November 28 2018, @05:54PM (#767382) Journal

        My comment was supposed to be taken a little different. All of these folks decry the 1% and claim the 1% should carry the world burden, yet they themselves are part of that 1% and wont acknowledge it.

        --
        Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
        • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28 2018, @09:37PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28 2018, @09:37PM (#767515)

          Because that's a complete and absolute straw man, and you know it. When they talk about the 1%, they aren't talking about the global 1%.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28 2018, @11:04PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28 2018, @11:04PM (#767555)

          Now adjust that for cost of living.