Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday November 28 2018, @06:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the love-is-in-the-dna dept.

Phys.org:

In recent years, scientists have discovered that early humans moving out of Africa encountered Neanderthals living in parts of what is now Europe and Eastern Asia. In comparing Neanderthal DNA with modern humans, researchers have found that there was a least one pairing that led to offspring, which is reflected in the DNA of humans—approximately 2 percent of the DNA in non-African humans today is Neanderthal. In this new effort, the researchers have found evidence that suggests there was more than one such encounter.

Their findings make logical sense, considering that anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals coexisted for approximately 30,000 years. Recent research by other groups had suggested that multiple offspring-producing unions had occurred—some people in East Asia, for example, were found to have up to 20 percent more Neanderthal DNA than people of strictly European descent. In this new effort, the researchers took a more stringent look to find out once and for all if there had been multiple pairings or just one. They pulled and analyzed data from the 1000 Genomes Project, measuring the amount of Neanderthal DNA in genetic material from volunteers. The first step was separating the data between people of European and Asian ancestry. Doing so suggested that both groups had evidence of early multiple mating events. The researchers then studied the rates of the two groups by creating simulations showing outcomes of differing numbers of mating events between the two groups. Data from the simulations was then fed into a machine-learning algorithm that showed DNA percentage patterns based on the number of cross-breeding events that had occurred.

When you play Barry White, anything can happen.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday November 29 2018, @03:20PM (2 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday November 29 2018, @03:20PM (#767743) Homepage Journal

    Assuming we're the more intelligent species wouldn't be terribly wise. Neanderthal had larger brains and there's good indication they had domesticated animals long before homo sapiens did. Higher IQ scores among humans also mirror the larger percentages of neanderthal DNA regionally fairly precisely.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 29 2018, @05:43PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 29 2018, @05:43PM (#767809)

    Yep.

    Neanderthals had a big disadvantage in spear throwing due to a shoulder joint difference. They were also less social, showing DNA that tends to make people more autistic. They had more-cylindrical body shapes, possibly causing a heat exhaustion disadvantage in summer fights.

    They were probably better tool users. (DNA evidence for visual processing and thinking) They could better tolerate the cold and the dark.

  • (Score: 2) by DutchUncle on Friday November 30 2018, @08:12PM

    by DutchUncle (5370) on Friday November 30 2018, @08:12PM (#768422)

    Quite the reverse. Which would you expect to win a bar fight, the "more intelligent" college kid or the tough construction worker? We're descended from the winners, not necessarily the brightest.