SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
In a followup to an article discussed previously here on SoylentNews:
Bloomberg has a three-part series on the use of an obscure legal document that unscrupulous lenders are using against small businesses.
- In Part 1 - I Hereby Confess Judgement, (the part discussed earlier on SoylentNews,) they go into detail on what the predatory lenders are doing to small businesses using a document known as a "Confession of Judgement" to extract court wins from small businesses without a trial.
- In Part 2 - The $1.7 Million Man, they go into how a debt collector became NYC's top earning official.
- In Part 3 - Rubber Stamp Justice, the article describes how the courts are involved, and what some of them are doing to prevent this abuse.
After the story was released on Bloomberg, the New York State Attorney General's office opened a formal investigation last month.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Predatory Lending is Crushing Small Businesses (continued)
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 61 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Hacking's just another word for nothing left to kludge.
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday December 04 2018, @10:17PM (4 children)
That's certainly one of the flaws, yes.
There are so many others it's hard to know where to start really.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday December 05 2018, @03:09AM (3 children)
Can we point out the one thing that Libertarianism is absolutely right about? The concept that unless, and until, you infringe upon the rights of some other person, no one has the right to tell you how to live your own life. That is, once you reach the age of majority, you don't have to answer to any church, any non-profit, any social movement, any self-appointed authority, the media, the insurance industry, or anyone else who comes along, telling you what you _should_be_doing_.
(Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday December 05 2018, @05:06AM (2 children)
The problem is when is someone infringing on the rights of someone else and what exactly are those rights. There's a spectrum from physically assaulting someone for no reason that most everyone agrees is wrong to things like burning oil and releasing CO2 that may affect everyone.
In libertarian land, putting lead in gasoline and paint was fine until at some point there was enough evidence that it was infringing on peoples right not to have lead poisoning. At what point was there enough evidence?
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday December 05 2018, @02:44PM (1 child)
So - uhhhhh - lemme get this right. Lead was introduced into paint and gasoline by Libertarians? That was back when Libertarians ruled congress, right? And, the Senate. And the White House.
Wanna know what I think? I think it was mostly Republicans and Democrats reaping the profits off that lead. I'm quite sure a few Libertarians were in on it, but for each libertarian, there were about 40 Dems, and about 40 Reps, and maybe 6 or 7 indies and/or 3rd party.
I also kinda think that Libertarians are misunderstood by a lot of people. Maybe that's why they can't win 2% of the electoral vote.
(Score: 3, Touché) by dry on Wednesday December 05 2018, @03:21PM
No, when lead was introduced into paint etc, things were how Libertarians want things, government staying out of peoples and companies business. it's an example of how things would be in libertarian land.