Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday December 05 2018, @03:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the commoditize-your-complement dept.

Early to embed and early to rise? Western Digital drops veil on SweRVy RISC-V based designs

Western Digital today finally flashed the results of its vow to move a billion controller cores to RISC-V designs. WD said last year it needed an open and extensible CPU architecture for its purpose-built drive controllers and other devices. As we explained then, no one knew for sure what processors WD has used for its disk and SSD controllers, though they was likely Arm-compatible chips – such as Arm9 and Cortex-M3 parts. It is known that the firm uses Intel CPUs with its ActiveScale archive systems and Tegile all-flash and hybrid arrays.

Last year, the disk and solid-state drive manufacturer vowed that RISC-V was its future, and today it announced the SweRV core, a networked cache coherency scheme, and a SweRV instruction set simulator.

[...] The SweRV core has a two-way superscalar design and is a 32-bit, nine-stage pipeline core, meaning several instructions can be loaded at once and execute simultaneously to save time. It is also an in-order core, whose relative single core performance (a simulated 4.9 CoreMark/Mhz) is expected to exceed that of many out-of-order cores, such as the Arm Cortex A15 (actual 4.72CoreMark/Mhz). Clock speeds go up to 1.8Ghz and it will be built on a 28mm [28nm] CMOS process technology.

WD said it hopes open-sourcing the core will drive development of data-centric applications such as Internet of Things (IoT), secure processing, industrial controls and more. We understand WD's ambitions for using RISC-V CPUs go beyond disk and flash drive controllers.

Previously: Western Digital to Transition Consumption of Over One Billion Cores Per Year to RISC-V

Related: WD Announces Client NVMe SSDs with In-House Controllers


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 05 2018, @07:30PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 05 2018, @07:30PM (#770245)

    Kicking their ass on the high end isn't even near what's required - you just have to be competetive with the run-of-the-mill stuff, while ATTRACTING the high-end money people. Consumers are fickle.

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday December 05 2018, @08:04PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday December 05 2018, @08:04PM (#770257)

    If you're new and just "competitive", you need to be cheaper. If you're better, you can command the high-end margins.
    You need those margins to get anywhere, because even being "competitive" on the "high-end" against dominant established players requires a lot of resources, and gaining market share is even harder.