SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
With the Australian Labor Party caving in on the proposed encryption law that will allow Australian police and agencies to access private data directly from vendors, the new proposed laws are now agreed in principle to introduce government level snooping of user messages and encrypted files. Agencies like ASIO or the Australian Federal Police will have the ability to request that telecommunications and tech companies help them with their investigations and compel companies to build ways to allow targeted access to encrypted communications data.
Previously: Australian Government Pursues "Golden Key" for Encryption
Five Eyes Governments Get Even Tougher on Encryption
Apple Speaks Out Against Australian Anti-Encryption Law; Police Advised Not to Trigger Face ID
Australia follows New Zealand to demand passwords
New Australian Push For Encryption Backdoor in Wake of Alleged Terrorist Plot
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Thursday December 06 2018, @03:13AM (5 children)
The funny thing is, I think that Apple does have some underlying principles. They are kind of screwy, and confusing, but yes, they do have principles. Despite the whole cathedral vs the bazaar thing, Apple seems to believe that your data is your data. Few other companies share that principle, although many companies share the cathedral outlook on business.
It should be evident that I'm no Apple Phanboi, but, yes, some of their policies and actions are pro-consumer / pro-customer.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday December 06 2018, @04:19AM (4 children)
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/12/04/tim_cook_tech_jesus/ [theregister.co.uk]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Thursday December 06 2018, @03:19PM (3 children)
Humorous. Good article, I like it.
Now, let's contrast Cookie to Gatesie. Did Billy Boy, or any of his subordinates, ever speak out against any evils, other than "pirating" Windows? I know the Gatekeeper moaned and groaned about people not understanding that they needed to PAY FOR MSDOS - ohhhh - I guess I first heard that about MSDOS 3 or so. Now, today, he's a mysogenist, or anthropologist, or philanthropist, or something like that. But, when he was running things, he wanted to hang all of us from the mizzenmast, or the middenmast, or something like that, if we didn't give him heaps of money. And, I'm pretty sure I've never heard Bill make any mention of any of humanity's other vices, or virtues.
However good or bad Apple might be, they seem to recognize vices and virtues.
I gotta quit this though. I don't want to be mistaken for an Apple Phanboi, or a Job's Phan. Go ahead, post more Evil Apple stuff. I'll shut up now.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Thursday December 06 2018, @03:27PM (2 children)
Corporations speaking out about social issues is a relatively new trend.
Apple speaking out about how much they care about your privacy is a marketing move. It may be true, may not always remain true, and might not stop your data from leaking. Their fight with the FBI was the best press they could have had on this issue. But will they always remain "good"?
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 1) by DECbot on Thursday December 06 2018, @09:49PM (1 child)
Apple wants to protect your data because that means they then retain a monopoly over your data. Thus, if advertiser B wants to know the likelihood you, an iThing user, likes to shop for underwear C, advertiser B knows that they can only go to Apple to buy the data.
cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
(Score: 2) by Mykl on Friday December 07 2018, @02:20AM
Actually, even Apple doesn't know that you like to shop for underwear C.
Apple can afford to be privacy focused, because they are in the business of selling hardware, not user data. You're right, their position helps sell more hardware than if they sold data to the highest bidder, so there's no reason for them to change their privacy position any time soon. That's what separates them from Google, Facebook etc, who rely on being data-pimps to survive.