SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Former diplomat challenges 'fake' Guardian claims about Julian Assange meeting Paul Manafort
The Canary previously reported on criticisms from WikiLeaks and others which stressed that Guardian claims about [former Trump campaign manager Paul] Manafort meeting Assange in 2013, 2015 and March 2016 were false.
WikiLeaks said it was preparing to sue the Guardian on the matter. And Manafort is also considering legal action, saying this story is "totally false and deliberately libellous".
Narváez was initially consul and then first secretary at the Ecuadorian Embassy from 2010 to July 2018. He has now told The Canary that, to his knowledge, Manafort made no visits at any time during that period. He insisted:
"It is impossible for any visitor to enter the embassy without going through very strict protocols and leaving a clear record: obtaining written approval from the ambassador, registering with security personnel, and leaving a copy of ID. The embassy is the most surveilled on Earth; not only are there cameras positioned on neighbouring buildings recording every visitor, but inside the building every movement is recorded with CCTV cameras, 24/7. In fact, security personnel have always spied on Julian and his visitors. It is simply not possible that Manafort visited the embassy."
takyon: Paul Manafort did, however, speak to the Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno about the potential removal of Julian Assange from the embassy in London:
The President of Ecuador spoke with Paul Manafort about his desire to remove Julian Assange from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, a Manafort spokesperson confirmed Monday. "When Mr. Manafort met with President Moreno of Ecuador to discuss the China Development Fund, the president raised with Mr. Manafort his desire to remove Julian Assange from Ecuador's embassy," Jason Maloni, a Manafort spokesman, told CNN in a statement. "Mr. Manafort listened but made no promises as this was ancillary to the purpose of the meeting," Maloni's statement added. "There was no mention of Russia at the meeting."
The New York Times was first to report that President Lenin Moreno and his aides had expressed their desire to have Assange leave the embassy in at least two meetings with Manafort in exchange for concessions from the US like debt relief, citing three people familiar with the talks. Assange has been holed up at the Ecuadorian embassy, since 2012.
See also: Manafort denies ever meeting with Assange
Did Someone Plant a Story Tying Paul Manafort to Julian Assange?
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 06 2018, @08:39PM (23 children)
I wasn't advocating skipping due process just common sense. Trump defenders need to face reality, because if Trump successfully avoids prosecution it will legitimize this level of corruption and bully tactics. This paves the way for tyranny and we will become a distorted reflection of Russia and its "democracy".
Speaking of blind acceptance, that is exactly what I'm trying to push back against!! The Trumpettes blindly follow the GOP and either believe Trump's lies or they think he is playing 26D chess. It is ridiculous and incredibly dangerous for what remains of our own "democracy".
(Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Thursday December 06 2018, @10:47PM (8 children)
Again, we have this vague assertion that Trump has committed crimes. I gather you may be the same AC as the one who asserted [soylentnews.org] Trump did a variety of things, some which would be serious crimes. So what's the evidence to support those assertions?
If there is a case out there, then nail him. It would be a welcome precedent. But we shouldn't imprison people just because some people feel they're guilty of something.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @04:55PM (7 children)
Hey moron you missed the point and i was quite clear about not jailing withoit due process.
I guess that mental glitch that makes you defend him is more serious than we thought.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @05:14PM (6 children)
Sure, I noticed you said that, and then you blew it off with unsubstantiated accusations.
Sorry, Buttercup, but a huge part of due process is beyond a reasonable doubt (for criminal proceedings). Merely saying that Trump is guilty of something isn't good enough. You have yet to provide evidence for why you think he's guilty of the things he would be tried in court for.
I'm not looking for court-level rigor here, but I have yet to read anything in this thread that is remotely substantial. It's time to practice what you preach.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @05:29PM (5 children)
Kshallow at it again.
Both sides! Good people! Civility!
I get it, you are upset. Your inside man at the WH might be done, sad times indeed.
Believing in due process does not prevent me from sharing the facts as i have seen them presented. Again, i listed nothing that is not already fact, but fun to see your spin machine leap into action. I love how "don't be mean!!!" is all you have left now. A weak hand, you should divert your energy elsewhere.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @05:43PM (4 children)
If you really believe in due process, which doesn't look likely at present.
Otherwise, I agree - in that something else is preventing you from sharing those facts. I think it is because you don't have facts to share.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @07:41PM (3 children)
Oh, so you're one of those "he said it out loud in public so it can't be a crime" huh?
I'll take your stupid bait, list the accusations I made that you want more info on. What is going to happen is I will list out public statements and "coincidences" such as the Saudi's booking millions of dollars worth of Trump hotel rooms and you will simply respond with "then why hasn't Trump been charged and put in jail then?" to which I will reply "Good fucking question!". Actually, more likely you would say "it isn't a crime to book hotel rooms" which would point to your 100% intellectual dishonesty. Either you're a trumptard who will say anything to preserve your version of reality or you're a shill. I'm guessing the latter.
How he made it to the presidency with "grab her by the pussy" and "I could shoot someone on 5th Avenue" is beyond me, and how you can keep defending such a craven human being is baffling. Your tactics are slimy and you don't give a shit about the truth.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @11:31PM (2 children)
That's not evidence of crime. We're still coming up empty here.
No, I'm one of those people who believe that if you're going to accuse someone of something, you better have evidence supporting that accusation.
What exactly is supposed to be bad about those remarks? I read the context and I just don't care about statements taken out of context. And of course, they aren't evidence of crime.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 08 2018, @09:25PM (1 child)
Immoral fuckwit you are, at least you make a good foil for the discussions around here.
Morality and the Law are not actually the same thing, but that is a bigger topic for when your balls drop.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday December 09 2018, @12:03AM
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 06 2018, @10:51PM (8 children)
This statement assumes the existence of "this level of corruption and bully tactics" and argues about about Trump defenders facing reality.
It is a classic example of begging the question.
If you actually want to convince people instead of just virtue signal, stop attacking Trump's supporters and provide evidence and citations against him. Claiming guilt without evidence is what totalitarian regimes do. You don't want to collude with totalitarians do you?
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @02:47AM (7 children)
The things I posted were the things that are common knowledge, all of them. I specifically did not include "traitor" even though I believe he is one. With the level of vitriol leveled at liberals around here all the time I say fuck off with your calls for civility. You Trump supporters are big believers in personal responsibility and no nonsense "telling it like it is", so give me a fucking break with your whinging. It is like you can see the end coming and you've just gotta pout like a bunch of babies instead of facing your own bad decision.
We grow a lot through our mistakes, but only if we can admit they are mistakes.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @06:41AM (6 children)
I'm not a Trump supporter, and it was actually meant as genuine advice. You keep alienating the people you want to win over. You have TDS so bad that you cannot even take an objective look at the emotional rants you post.
You think Trump is bad. Yes we get it. Stop calling anybody asking for the evidence of crimes a deplorable Trump supporter. Some of them actually think he is bad but are ethical enough to not convict without evidence. "Common knowledge" is not evidence. Websites saying Trump is racist, Trump is bad, Trump is dishonest, are not evidence unless they have citations or examples.
Stop chanting "Four legs Good, Orange Hair Bad" long enough to actually think and consider your words.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @04:53PM (5 children)
Lol go away shill. Keep trying to play that middle ground, only makes you look more shitty and stupid. If you do not like Trump then stop getting so bemt out of shape when someone tells the truth about him.
TDS is actually Trump's Deranged Supporters. Keep hammering that mantra though, you will sqay a few dumb fucks. If people still support Trump then they are stupid. No amount of projection will change that.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @05:16PM (4 children)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @05:34PM (3 children)
No evidence? Kwallow going into the mud. You can find all the admission on Twitter where Trump contradicts himself all the time. That is a good start, then you can go look at all the times Trump has said "i didnt know aboout it" and then engage the last few neurons you have left to figure out how likely it is that a presidential candidate does not know about widespread criminal behavior supporting his own campaign.
I'll wait, you obviously have a lot of catching up to do.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @05:45PM (2 children)
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I'm not going to look when you can't be bothered to.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @07:46PM (1 child)
I've been paying attention and have a functional memory. You are a shill trying to muddy the waters and pretend that everything is fine. "Traitor" is an extraordinary claim, the rest is just obvious if you are paying attention.
So tell me khallow, do you not pay attention to the news in any way shape or form? Have you not heard Trump speak for more than 10 seconds ever? I'm having a hard time understanding how you could have missed all his lies and criminal behavior when they are being done right in front of you.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @11:32PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @12:38AM
So he's pretty much guilty until proven otherwise! Got it.
Man, I'm glad I'm not a US-ian, imagine living in a country like that where a liar is automatically guilty of accused crimes until proven otherwise!
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @02:36AM (3 children)
I reply to all of you whiners "birther movement" and "her emails" as one giant fuck you to your equivocations.
I love how TRUMP is your Vietnam. You've chosen a lying narcissist to be "your guy", everything I accused him of is true even if not something we can send him to prison for.
He is a proven piece of shit lying conman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump [wikipedia.org]
I get that you wanted to disrupt the system, a fuck you to the government with a tear-it-down attitude. But enough is enough, admit you made a mistake and believed Trump would be better than he was. You'll have sympathy from liberals who wanted more from Obama and were betrayed by Hillary.
For the ridiculous "authoritarian" claims I reiterate "birther" and "emails" and raise you "tax returns". Also, I would never vote someone guilty as a juror if I did not feel the evidence warranted it. That doesn't prevent me from believing what seems incredibly obvious, Trump is not just a lying morally bankrupt businessman but also an actual criminal. Tell me, do you think OJ did it? If you say yes does that make you an authoritarian fascist?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @05:24PM (2 children)
Once again, roughly 95% of people vote for the major parties. Here, the choices were Trump or Clinton. Saying it was a "mistake" implies that there was a better choice out there.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2018, @07:58PM (1 child)
Oh sheeeit!
Some tiny bit of contrition from khallow!!!
You just made my day to see the crack in the wall finally go all the way to the ceiling.
I think this is the first example of true regret, though teeny tiny and still trying to apologize for itself.
To address your little self-excusing bullshit, while I dislike Clinton and didn't vote for her because she fucked over Sanders; it is still clear that Clinton would have been better for the US. Trump was a joke who made it by blatantly lying and manipulating conservative voters and if you paid any attention to his history you would have realized that. Voting for Trump was a mistake even though Clinton did not deserve to win either. She was truly the lesser of two evils. Oh, and the ever more likely reality that there was indeed collusion with Russia to influence the election.
Now I get that you will want to disagree. I get that. However, you could have disagreed up until about 6 months ago at minimum without looking like an idiot. To disagree at this point ignores the massive investigation that had zero convictions for HRC compared to the multiple convictions of Trump's administration/campaign. Just admit you got fooled by some good propaganda that worked the conservative anger response and stop being a pussy about it.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 07 2018, @11:29PM
And this is "clear" why? I get that you dislike Trump somewhat more than Clinton. So what?
Now I get that you will want to disagree. I get that. However, you could have disagreed up until about 6 months ago at minimum without looking like an idiot. To disagree at this point ignores the massive investigation that had zero convictions for HRC compared to the multiple convictions of Trump's administration/campaign. Just admit you got fooled by some good propaganda that worked the conservative anger response and stop being a pussy about it
Of course, I disagree. There's no convictions of Clinton despite the strong evidence that she committed multiple felonies - the FBI investigation even notes some of those, but chooses to classify them as not criminal activities. Not prosecuting criminal acts, is a high level of corruption. Meanwhile all that is had on Trump are coincidences, some which may have been staged by some on the Democrat side or by the FBI. Clinton also has a long established habit of lying to her constituents, such as when attacking women who had been sexually assaulted by her husband.
And I'm sure that there would be condescending conservatives talking about how much better Trump would be right now, if Clinton had been elected.