Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday December 07 2018, @10:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the everyone-should-just-chill-out dept.

Medical cannabis advocates suing the state over Prop 2 override have a bigger goal: challenging the Legislature's disregard of the peoples' will

The medical cannabis advocates suing the state after Monday's passage of a Proposition 2 replacement bill are seeking to overturn that law, yes — but they also want to contest what they see as government overreach in muting the voice of the people in an election.

In the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in 3rd District Court by former Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson, the heads of the Epilepsy Association of Utah (EAU) and Together for Responsible Use and Cannabis Education (TRUCE) accuse the Legislature of abridging the rights of voters in an effort to appease The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. And they argue that the Utah Medical Cannabis Act violates the state constitution's provision for ballot initiatives by sweeping aside the plan approved by a majority of voters.

"For three years, we advocated on the Hill," said Christine Stenquist, president of TRUCE. "For two years, we've been in a campaign for the proposition. And when I saw it undermined so quickly on the first business day, I started to wonder: Is the initiative process in Utah just a suggestion box? Are our votes really meaning anything in this political process? How long do we just have to let politics happen to us?"

The state constitution vests legislative power equally in the Legislature and "the people of the State of Utah." Some of the architects of the Proposition 2 replacement law, however, say the lawsuit stands on shaky legal ground.

Previously: Mormon Church, Politicians, and Advocates Back Medical Cannabis Compromise in Utah


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by NewNic on Saturday December 08 2018, @01:22AM (2 children)

    by NewNic (6420) on Saturday December 08 2018, @01:22AM (#771376) Journal

    "No true Scotsman".

    Look it up.

    --
    lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 08 2018, @01:47AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 08 2018, @01:47AM (#771388)

    We all know that it's atypical of Republican politicians to be authoritarian. That's why the vast majority of them support unconstitutional wars, the Unpatriotic Act, the NSA's unconstitutional mass surveillance, the TSA, the drug war, and other authoritarian policies. Just accept it.

    But what about Democrats, huh? You said something bad about Republicans, so you therefore must be in favor of the more authoritarian Democrats!

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 08 2018, @04:07PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 08 2018, @04:07PM (#771553)

    Oh, right.

    Sorry, this just in from NewNic, everybody:

    all republicans are identical, everywhere, and goosestep together. Anything that looks like regional variations is a delusion.

    Thanks, back to your regularly scheduled evening news WASP and bimbette.