Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday December 07 2018, @10:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the everyone-should-just-chill-out dept.

Medical cannabis advocates suing the state over Prop 2 override have a bigger goal: challenging the Legislature's disregard of the peoples' will

The medical cannabis advocates suing the state after Monday's passage of a Proposition 2 replacement bill are seeking to overturn that law, yes — but they also want to contest what they see as government overreach in muting the voice of the people in an election.

In the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in 3rd District Court by former Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson, the heads of the Epilepsy Association of Utah (EAU) and Together for Responsible Use and Cannabis Education (TRUCE) accuse the Legislature of abridging the rights of voters in an effort to appease The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. And they argue that the Utah Medical Cannabis Act violates the state constitution's provision for ballot initiatives by sweeping aside the plan approved by a majority of voters.

"For three years, we advocated on the Hill," said Christine Stenquist, president of TRUCE. "For two years, we've been in a campaign for the proposition. And when I saw it undermined so quickly on the first business day, I started to wonder: Is the initiative process in Utah just a suggestion box? Are our votes really meaning anything in this political process? How long do we just have to let politics happen to us?"

The state constitution vests legislative power equally in the Legislature and "the people of the State of Utah." Some of the architects of the Proposition 2 replacement law, however, say the lawsuit stands on shaky legal ground.

Previously: Mormon Church, Politicians, and Advocates Back Medical Cannabis Compromise in Utah


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by crafoo on Saturday December 08 2018, @03:49AM (1 child)

    by crafoo (6639) on Saturday December 08 2018, @03:49AM (#771423)

    No, of course not all on the left. It's just been so surprising to see leftists, self-labelled (inaccurately) liberals take up authoritarianism so quickly and gleefully. Do people naturally fear freedom? Many people seem to fear a free person walking among them. With freedom comes responsibility, and so possibly they believe your typical person is not responsible enough to be free. Therefore, in their mind, a free person represents a real danger. I believe it's a fundamental breakdown of culture; our failure to adequately teach each of the last few generations what it is to be free and how to take up the responsibility required of them as an adult in a free society.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by HiThere on Saturday December 08 2018, @04:11AM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Saturday December 08 2018, @04:11AM (#771431) Journal

    I'm sorry you were surprised. You must not have paid attention in history classes. Authoritarianism is orthogonal to the left-right spectrum. Both sides contains anarchists and both sides contain those that worship power. IIRC the first socialized medicine policy in the modern world was initiated by Count Bismark. A noted authoritarian. (If not the first, he certainly pushed one.) In most policies, however, he was distinctly right-wing. (What do you expect of an aristocrat?)

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.