Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984
Uber allegedly ignored safety warnings before self-driving fatality
Just days after Uber announced its plans to resume testing of its self-driving taxis, new information reveals that a whistleblower had made the company aware of the technology's safety failures before the incident in Arizona last March, which saw a pedestrian struck and killed by one of Uber's vehicles, and which led to the suspension of all testing activity.
According to The Information, Robbie Miller, a manager in the testing-operations group, sent a cautionary email to a number of Uber's executive and lawyers, warning that the vehicles were "routinely in accidents resulting in damage. This is usually the result of poor behavior of the operator or the AV technology."
It appears the email was prompted by an incident in Pittsburgh, where just a few days before Miller sent the message an Uber prototype swerved completely off the road and onto the sidewalk, where it continued to drive. According to Miller's email, the episode was "essentially ignored" for days, until Miller raised it with other managers. He also noted that towards the end of 2017, it took two weeks for engineers to investigate the logs of a separate Arizona incident, in which an Uber vehicle almost collided with another car.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 12 2018, @07:31PM (10 children)
What you have to do is regulate the industry. It's pretty simple, the safety of society is the purview of government.
So:
Government, stop shirking your duty
Industry, stop whining about Government
As long as everyone follows the rules it will still be a level playing field (and anyone breaking the rules stands a good chance of getting caught if there is a fatality or two involved).
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Wednesday December 12 2018, @08:00PM (5 children)
I have the following defects with your solution.
1. The government is bribed not to do its duty.
2. Industry doesn't want to stop whining about government.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 12 2018, @08:17PM (4 children)
History lesson: When regulation first came to the auto industry, the "big three" in Detroit did everything in their power to resist being regulated. They fought for at least 20 years (depending on how you count). Then, after years of grudging recalls, Detroit got the message, it's cheaper to own up to your mistakes, work out the safety recall and then get on with business. The alternative of years of courts and lawyers wasn't really cost effective, and when details came out it was also bad public relations. Through (approximately) the 1990s and maybe a little longer, there was grudging respect between Detroit and D.C. and safety regulation actually worked quite well.
Then, the next generation came in (probably on both sides) and it was right back to a contentious relationship.
My take: Regulate and keep on regulating, eventually people will come around.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by legont on Thursday December 13 2018, @02:52AM
Regulations are actually helping companies; it just takes time for them to realize. The main reason (there are others) is that without regulations it is always run to the bottom - one has to make cheaper things than the others and cutting corners is the easiest way. Eventually the industry falls. Regulations prevent this by setting a common bottom.
It's true for everything made by humans and all the exceptions are temporary.
"Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday December 13 2018, @03:38AM (2 children)
So, when did "regulation first came to the auto industry,"? You realize that looking back in time, there wasn't a "big three"? It had to be mid-fifties before it was "big three". Jeep, AMC, Rambler, DeSoto, and so many more have gone belly up and/or been bought out. I suppose we can point to some arbitrary regulation, and say, "This is the point at which regulation first came to the auto industry!" At what point in time was that? 1980, maybe?
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 13 2018, @05:38PM (1 child)
> So, when did "regulation first came to the auto industry,"?
A case could be made for the creation of the US DOT and NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Admin.),
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_Traffic_Safety_Administration#History [wikipedia.org]
Same link mentions an earlier start in Europe on harmonizing auto regulations worldwide.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 13 2018, @08:30PM
Same AC, responding to myself. The more I thought about this history, this could also be the origins of what I think of as a "nanny mentality" -- the mindset that it is possible to eliminate all risk and make things completely safe. Given the car-centered culture in the USA (possibly even more so in the 1960s than today), this first step of establishing a national Dept of Transportation and the regulatory arm, NHTSA could have been the first step onto the slippery slope?
Was this the step that led to helicopter parents, kids that aren't allowed to walk home from school and the rest of the "softening of America?"
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Wednesday December 12 2018, @09:06PM (2 children)
Government, stop shirking your duty
Tell it to the voters. Oversight is their obligation. They are the only ones that can put the dog out when it craps on the carpet.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 2, Interesting) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday December 12 2018, @09:50PM (1 child)
Which is exactly why the government keeps the voters in the dark about everything it can. Whistleblowers are the only way we get any information.
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday December 13 2018, @12:13AM
Whistleblowers are the only way we get any information.
The more the merrier. It's up to the voters to take the initiative to get at the truth. They shouldn't expect it to be spoon fed, unless they vote for an FOIA with teeth.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Immerman on Wednesday December 12 2018, @11:18PM
Or alternately, remove the corporate veil of immunity. Throw executives in prison. Claw back bonuses and salary. Penalize stock-holders for the crimes of their company.
Basically, give the people with power some incentive to be responsible, instead of having incentive structures designed to profit them when they cut corners, and protect them from any consequences of the inevitable problems they create.