Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday December 15 2018, @07:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the airline-spelled-backwards-is-enalpria dept.

ArsTechnica:

[...] Assuming these electric aircraft could be built, would they actually lower emissions? At present, no. Given the average emissions involved with powering the US grid, the emissions involved with powering an electric aircraft (including losses during transmission) would be about 20 percent higher than those generated by a modern, efficient jet engine. That doesn't mean they'd be entirely useless from a climate perspective, though. Once the additional warming effects of aircraft are taken into consideration, the electric aircraft comes out ahead by about 30 percent.

Future considerations complicate things pretty quickly, though. The price of renewable energy is expected to keep dropping, which will make renewables a larger part of the grid, lowering the emissions. The authors estimate that the vast majority of charging will take place during daylight hours—the peak of solar production—as well. Assuming future solar production leads to a discount on electric use during the day, it could help the economics of electric aircraft; currently, they only make sense economically with fuel at about $100/barrel.

How all of this would affect air travel is very sensitive to the capacity of future batteries. The authors estimate that an effective range of about 1,100 kilometers would allow electric aircraft to cover 15 percent of the total air miles (and corresponding fuel use) and nearly half the total flights. That would raise the total electricity demand by about one percent globally, although most of that would affect industrialized nations. Upping the range to 2,200 kilometers would allow 80 percent of the global flight total to be handled by electric aircraft.

Zeppelins still don't seem to figure into the answer.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 15 2018, @11:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 15 2018, @11:42AM (#774740)

    Solar/wind needs better storage tech, but thats probably coming too slowly. There is plenty of thorium, and lots of U238 for fast breeder plants.
    When (if)* fossil fuels run out and people start freezing to death in winter and going hungry all year round, you are going to see much less opposition to nuclear plants, partly because they will be using greenies for fertilizer.

    *Thomas Gold wrote a couple of well-researched books that convincingly argued that 'fossil' fuels are mostly primordial, the bio components are contamination from the deep biosphere, and that there is a hell of a lot more of it than oil/gas/coal companies will admit to. Power from the Earth and The Deep Hot Biosphere.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1