Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984
FCC panel wants to tax Internet-using businesses and give the money to ISPs
A Federal Communications Commission advisory committee has proposed a new tax on Netflix, Google, Facebook, and many other businesses that require Internet access to operate.
If adopted by states, the recommended tax would apply to subscription-based retail services that require Internet access, such as Netflix, and to advertising-supported services that use the Internet, such as Google and Facebook. The tax would also apply to any small- or medium-sized business that charges subscription fees for online services or uses online advertising. The tax would also apply to any provider of broadband access, such as cable or wireless operators.
The collected money would go into state rural broadband deployment funds that would help bring faster Internet access to sparsely populated areas. Similar universal service fees are already assessed on landline phone service and mobile phone service nationwide. Those phone fees contribute to federal programs such as the FCC's Connect America Fund, which pays AT&T and other carriers to deploy broadband in rural areas.
The state tax proposal comes from the FCC's Broadband Deployment Advisory Committee (BDAC), a group criticized by San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo—who quit the committee—"for advancing the interests of the telecommunications industry over those of the public." BDAC members include AT&T, Comcast, Google Fiber, Sprint, other ISPs and industry representatives, researchers, advocates, and local government officials.
The BDAC tax proposal is part of a "State Model Code for Accelerating Broadband Infrastructure Deployment and Investment." Once finalized by the BDAC, each state would have the option of adopting the code.
An AT&T executive who is on the FCC advisory committee argued that the recommended tax should apply even more broadly, to any business that benefits financially from broadband access in any way. The committee ultimately adopted a slightly more narrow recommendation that would apply the tax to subscription services and advertising-supported services only.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday December 17 2018, @12:45AM (2 children)
You're getting sidetracked. Let's go with a specific example. If SN had to start paying this tax, the community would really be the ones having to pay it. We'd have no choice but to pass the cost increase on because we don't have huge piles of cash that we like to roll around naked in. So if a business that isn't profit based is going to pass the cost along to the consumers, what do you think the profit-centric businesses are going to do?
tl;dr This isn't a tax increase on "us", it's a tax increase on you.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 17 2018, @07:14PM (1 child)
people need to stop registering their businesses with the government like dutiful fools and start accepting cryptocurrencies. screw their taxes. everyone could easily set aside would-be tax money and create a national response force that deals with any leaches that come knocking.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday December 17 2018, @10:50PM
As a good southern boy, I'm hard pressed to disagree with the "shoot the revenooers" strategy of economic reform.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.