Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984
FCC panel wants to tax Internet-using businesses and give the money to ISPs
A Federal Communications Commission advisory committee has proposed a new tax on Netflix, Google, Facebook, and many other businesses that require Internet access to operate.
If adopted by states, the recommended tax would apply to subscription-based retail services that require Internet access, such as Netflix, and to advertising-supported services that use the Internet, such as Google and Facebook. The tax would also apply to any small- or medium-sized business that charges subscription fees for online services or uses online advertising. The tax would also apply to any provider of broadband access, such as cable or wireless operators.
The collected money would go into state rural broadband deployment funds that would help bring faster Internet access to sparsely populated areas. Similar universal service fees are already assessed on landline phone service and mobile phone service nationwide. Those phone fees contribute to federal programs such as the FCC's Connect America Fund, which pays AT&T and other carriers to deploy broadband in rural areas.
The state tax proposal comes from the FCC's Broadband Deployment Advisory Committee (BDAC), a group criticized by San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo—who quit the committee—"for advancing the interests of the telecommunications industry over those of the public." BDAC members include AT&T, Comcast, Google Fiber, Sprint, other ISPs and industry representatives, researchers, advocates, and local government officials.
The BDAC tax proposal is part of a "State Model Code for Accelerating Broadband Infrastructure Deployment and Investment." Once finalized by the BDAC, each state would have the option of adopting the code.
An AT&T executive who is on the FCC advisory committee argued that the recommended tax should apply even more broadly, to any business that benefits financially from broadband access in any way. The committee ultimately adopted a slightly more narrow recommendation that would apply the tax to subscription services and advertising-supported services only.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 17 2018, @03:03AM (1 child)
Try this on for size:
AFTER they have provided broadband to the community in question
AFTER it has been tested and approved by a third party auditing body that has to include observers from the targeted community, demonstrating bandwidth, nondiscriminatory network delivery, high uptime and tight SLA responses
AFTER the price to the consumer has been set at a level such that the participants will willingly pay for it
THEN they get to seek reimbursement for their installation expenses
AND for each year of audited, desirable, effectively priced, well-maintained service they get to seek reimbursement for disproportionate per capita expenses.
No want to build? No moolah. No auditing? No moolah. No good service? No moolah.
All records are public and must be provided, free of charge, under penalty of perjury PLUS forfeiting all monies received for the past ten years, on request to anyone in the effected area, or in a regulatory body (state, local or federal).
But they'd never agree to that.
(Score: 2) by Freeman on Monday December 17 2018, @04:36PM
That would mean they would be held accountable for the funds they take. They don't want any of that pesky accountability.
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"