Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday December 17 2018, @11:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-don't-see-what-you-did-there dept.

PLEX, this last week pushed out changes to its ROKU users (I am one). That made using PLEX nearly impossible for some people. Light and Dark gray color palate. White text on light gray background, to the point of the PLEX 1/4 screen height logo and spinning-working throbber being lost on the background.

So war ensues... See Plex.tv support forums if you must.

My question to you all, "What is TECH's responsibility to the Handicapped?".

Should good TECH also have a backdoor method allowing those with usability issues to still use the product, when TECH changes directions? What about lifetime pre-paid services that are now unusable? Should there be immediate return of funds, so we can buy the second best solution (now the best choice for us)? Should any change be signed off by a third party auditor to insure continued usability?

So again, asked differently, what is TECH's moral responsibility?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday December 18 2018, @04:30PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday December 18 2018, @04:30PM (#775892) Journal

    Stupid terminology. My color vision, as well as my poor vision, is indeed a handicap. It is not a disability, or Uncle Sam would offer me some disability pay. In golf, you get a handicap, not a disability.

    Screw that politically correct nonsense.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2