SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for Bytram
Upwind wind plants can reduce flow to downwind neighbors
New National Science Foundation and Department of Energy-funded research highlights a previously unexplored consequence of the global proliferation of wind energy facilities: a wake effect from upwind facilities that can reduce the energy production of their downwind neighbors.
In collaboration with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), faculty at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) and the University of Denver (DU) developed the paper, "Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development," which appears in Nature Energy. The study uses atmospheric modeling along with economic and legal analysis to demonstrate that wind facility wake effects -- which occur when groups of turbines reduce wind speed for miles behind them -- are measurable and predictable.
"This work argues for more thoughtful deployment of wind energy," said Julie Lundquist, a researcher at CU and lead author of the study. Lundquist, who works with NREL's National Wind Technology Center, is an associate professor in CU Boulder's Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and a fellow of the CU/NREL Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute. The paper is co-authored by K. K. DuVivier of DU's Denver Sturm College of Law, as well as Daniel Kaffine and Jessica Tomaszewski of CU.
Wind facility wakes have been observed to extend up to 25 miles. Of the 994 individual wind facilities in the United States in 2016, nearly 90 percent are within 25 miles of another wind facility, all of which could experience wake effects.
"Just as upstream water users can knowingly or unknowingly impose additional costs downstream, the same effect is in play here," said Kaffine, a professor in CU Boulder's Department of Economics. Research shows that wake effects do not undermine wind energy because they are predictable and only occur in specific atmospheric conditions.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20 2018, @03:17PM (4 children)
The side effects though aren't quite so obvious.
Lighter winds probably results in less heat transfer from soil to air. Which means higher soil temperatures. This would amplify the effects of drought, particularly in areas like the U.S. midwest. This could potentially result in lower food production, and more stress on the ogallala aquifer.
I don't know if the department of the interior takes any data on annual soil temperatures. I know one of the departments does survey and classify arable land nationally. It would nice to know if that survey includes enough detail to determine the effects of wind farms. In any case, better data will give better prediction capability.
Probably there is a paper to be written doing comparitive analysis of weather, arable land, and water well depth related to wind farms. Probably that paper should be issued annually as an EPA report. If it isn't already.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20 2018, @04:46PM (3 children)
That's probably like comparing a fart to a coal power plant annual output.
There is no good way to produce electricity. We must conserve and not use.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 21 2018, @12:51AM (2 children)
Unless, of course, the use is more important than the non-use. It doesn't take much for that to be true.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 21 2018, @09:37AM (1 child)
agree
disagree
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday December 21 2018, @01:32PM