Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984
As companies shift to CI/CD (continuous integration/continuous delivery), they face a problem around monitoring and fixing problems in builds that have been deployed. How do you deal with an issue after moving onto the next delivery milestone? Harness, the startup launched last year by AppDynamics founder Jyoti Bansal, wants to fix that with a new tool called 24×7 Service Guard.
The new tool is designed to help companies working with a continuous delivery process by monitoring all of the builds, regardless of when they were launched. What's more, the company claims that using AI and machine learning, it can dial back a problematic build to one that worked in an automated fashion, freeing developers and operations to keep working without worry.
[...] The tool watches every build, even days after deployment, taking advantage of data from tools like AppDynamics, New Relic, Elastic and Splunk, then using AI and machine learning to identify problems and bring them back to a working state without human intervention. What's more, your team can get a unified view of performance and the quality of every build across all of your monitoring and logging tools.
So what do you think? Are you using Continuous Delivery in your shop and if so, how is that working out for you?
(Score: 3, Insightful) by legont on Thursday December 20 2018, @09:20PM (4 children)
In truth,
computing systemssocial institutions are not this complex (because most human activity is not this complex); and, if you think yours is, then that's a signal that you should re-think your design."Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by krishnoid on Thursday December 20 2018, @10:36PM (3 children)
On the other hand, social institutions show behavior in the aggregate that doesn't appear in/isn't directly derivable from individual human behavior.
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it! -- Agent K
You can't make anything idiot proof because idiots are so ingenious. -- Ron Burns
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20 2018, @11:27PM
If a group of people behaves in a dumb, panicky, dangerous, animalic fashion, then that's only because individuals in that group are acting in that way.
So, the group behavior is indeed derivable from individual behavior; it's just that each individual might not realize he has this nature until it manifests within a group.
(Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 21 2018, @02:09PM
If a group of people behaves in a dumb, panicky, dangerous, animalic fashion, then that's only because individuals in that group are acting in that way.
So, the group behavior is indeed derivable from individual behavior; it's just that each individual might not realize he has this nature until it manifests within a group.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday December 21 2018, @07:34PM
On the other hand, social institutions show behavior in the aggregate that doesn't appear in/isn't directly derivable from individual human behavior.
So do computers.