Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday December 24 2018, @08:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the they're-not-kidding dept.

Japan suffers biggest natural population decline ever in 2018

Japan suffered its biggest natural population decline ever this year, government statistics show.

The fast-graying nation also posted a record-low birthrate, as the estimated number of babies born in 2018 dipped to 921,000 -- the lowest since records began in 1899 -- according to a report published Friday by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The number of newborns is estimated to have shrunk by 25,000 from 2017, and the figure remains under the 1 million mark for the third year running.

Deaths in 2018 also hit a postwar record high of 1.369 million, with a natural population decline of 448,000 -- the highest ever.

Beijing eyes two-child policy U-turn, but 'lonely generation' has moved on

For nearly 40 years, the Chinese government harshly restricted childbearing through the one-child rule in order to control population growth. That may soon change. Beijing appears to be on the cusp of abolishing all of its family planning rules — and is even encouraging young couples to have more children as a matter of patriotic urgency.

But attitudes toward parenthood have changed. Even though there is a two-child policy in place now, many Chinese still don't want to have more than one child — or any at all. "I think having one child is enough," said Chen Yiwen, a 25-year-old accountant and newlywed. "I won't be tempted to have more — even if the family planning policy is abolished." [...] "Besides, we already have two little babies — a poodle and a corgi," she said.

Related (JP): Japan Has Aged Out of its Economic Miracle
Toyota's $392 Robot Baby for Japanese People Without Companions
Gatebox: Your New Holographic AI Assistant "Waifu"
Japan's Fertility Crisis is Creating Economic and Social Woes Never Seen Before
Japan Has 1.48 Jobs for Every Applicant
Why a Generation in Japan Is Facing a Lonely Death

Related (CN): China's 'Missing Girls' Theory Likely Far Overblown, Study Shows
China "Three-Child Policy" Hinted by Stamp Design?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 25 2018, @05:18PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 25 2018, @05:18PM (#778363)

    You're an idiot. Countries can compete for resources without it being about race.

    Tell me, are the Yankees and Red Sox fans racist?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday December 25 2018, @05:43PM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday December 25 2018, @05:43PM (#778369) Journal

    Countries can compete for resources without it being about race.

    What makes you think all competition is racist? I made it quite clear what I was speaking of.

    In about 30-40 years, high population growth rate is going to become, for a couple of decades, almost solely an African problem, and my take is that the distinctive ethnicities of that continent will have trouble from the racists of the rest of the world as a result. You might even become part of the problem by then. Ideological shifting to other bad ideas is a common practice among those who know best.

    • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Wednesday December 26 2018, @04:01AM (1 child)

      by bzipitidoo (4388) on Wednesday December 26 2018, @04:01AM (#778481) Journal

      Long, long before humans or any animals at all existed, life has had to deal with the potential for overpopulation. Any species that cycles from boom to bust and back again is going to be very weak, and highly vulnerable to losing to competitors during busts. And that's only if, during a boom, they weren't able to strip every last resource essential to them, perhaps kill off every last member of a prey species they depend upon. In that case, no need for competitors to finish them off, they will have doomed themselves. Boom and bust is not a good strategy for long term survival. I rather suspect that all animals, ourselves included, have developed powerful instincts of self restraint when faced with slim pickings thanks to overcrowding, and will try to maintain a more even level of population.

      Cultural differences between any one group, such as Africans, and everyone else are a very weak force against such deep instincts that transcend species.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday December 26 2018, @06:24AM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday December 26 2018, @06:24AM (#778501) Journal

        Long, long before humans or any animals at all existed, life has had to deal with the potential for overpopulation. Any species that cycles from boom to bust and back again is going to be very weak, and highly vulnerable to losing to competitors during busts. And that's only if, during a boom, they weren't able to strip every last resource essential to them, perhaps kill off every last member of a prey species they depend upon. In that case, no need for competitors to finish them off, they will have doomed themselves. Boom and bust is not a good strategy for long term survival. I rather suspect that all animals, ourselves included, have developed powerful instincts of self restraint when faced with slim pickings thanks to overcrowding, and will try to maintain a more even level of population.

        So does your suspicion have any basis in fact? Boom and bust is not a strategy, it is an environment. And if you reproduce faster than rivals combined with better survival odds during the bust phase, then boom and bust can be great for long term survival.

        Cultural differences between any one group, such as Africans, and everyone else are a very weak force against such deep instincts that transcend species.

        Except, of course, when that isn't true.