Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday December 30 2018, @10:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-go-wrong dept.

The Trump administration EPA says regulations to reduce power plant emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants are too costly and should no longer be considered legally "appropriate and necessary."

In another proposed reversal of an Obama-era standard, the Environmental Protection Agency Friday said limiting mercury and other toxic emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants is not cost-effective and should not be considered "appropriate and necessary."

The EPA says it is keeping the 2012 restrictions in place for now, in large part because utilities have already spent billions to comply with them. But environmental groups worry the move is a step toward repealing the limits and could make it harder to impose other regulations in the future.

In a statement, the EPA said it is "providing regulatory certainty by transparently and accurately taking account of both costs and benefits."

The National Mining Association welcomed the move, calling the mercury limits "punitive" and "massively unbalanced."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday December 30 2018, @08:57PM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday December 30 2018, @08:57PM (#780059) Journal

    We know that border walls aren't effective and we know that most illegal immigrants come to the US via airplane on legitimate visas.

    You know nothing of the sort. Who told you all of that nonsense?

    Why don't you look up Tuscon, Arizona. I watched a video recently, in which the coroner of the county specifically stated that they average one dead person per day, just in that county. If roughly 300 people die in that area each year, due to the heavy traffic, how many do you think pass through the area without dying? Some are later apprehended, but far more make it into the US, and move on to areas with more employment.

    Are you making that shit up, or you're just parroting what some talking head told you?

    Like a lock on your door, the wall won't stop illegal aliens coming in - but it will separate the most determined law breakers from the opportunists.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by redneckmother on Sunday December 30 2018, @11:02PM

    by redneckmother (3597) on Sunday December 30 2018, @11:02PM (#780089)

    A quick "duck search" yields these.

        Illegal immigrant stats:

    https://www.factcheck.org/2018/06/illegal-immigration-statistics/ [factcheck.org]

        Illegal drugs:

    John Kelly, Trump’s chief of staff, acknowledged at a congressional hearing in April 2017, when he was Department of Homeland Security secretary, that illegal drugs from Mexico “mostly comes through the ports of entry.” At the hearing, Kelly said “the big issue really right now in drugs coming into the United States is the ports of entry.” https://www.c-span.org/video/?426451-1/john-kelly-faces-questions-border-wall-construction-extreme-vetting&start=2905 [c-span.org]

    --
    Mas cerveza por favor.