Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Sunday December 30 2018, @09:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the jumped-the-gun dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow1984

Chinese scientist who allegedly created the first genetically engineered babies is being detained

The Chinese scientist who shocked the world with claims of creating the first genetically engineered babies is being detained in the Chinese city of Shenzhen, according to a report in The New York Times.

[...] The Southern University of Science and Technology, based in Shenzhen, has denied the reporting around Dr. He's whereabouts and fate, telling theĀ Times, "Right now nobody's information is accurate, only the official channels are." Meanwhile, the official channels are staying silent.

Reporters found security personnel blocking access to the residence where Dr. He is reportedly staying and others denying access to the former offices Dr. He used to conduct his research. The scientist's name and biography remains on a board listing staff in the university’s biology department.

Previously: Chinese Scientist Claims to Have Created the First Genome-Edited Babies (Twins)
Furor Over Genome-Edited Babies Claim Continues (Updated)
Chinese Gene-Editing Scientist's Project Rejected for WHO Database (Plus: He Jiankui is Missing)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday December 31 2018, @06:25PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday December 31 2018, @06:25PM (#780335) Journal

    any scientist following the field would know that methods have been and are rapidly being developed that can substantially reduce the off-target mutation rate of CRISPR-editing

    This point is often missed.

    I am still supportive of Jiankui because IDGAF, but it's clear that the state-of-the-art in 5 years will look very different and a lot more reliable than whatever method he used.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 31 2018, @07:02PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 31 2018, @07:02PM (#780354)

    The big picture consequentialist reason I'm against it is because this kind of recklessness promotes more distrust in scientists and reinforces the "mad scientist" stereotype. These perspectives already negatively shape the public's opinions on scientific topics and causes uninformed reactionary policies (ban on embryonic stem cell funding, moratorium on gain-of-function research, HPV vaccination, etc.). I don't want the "playing god", "it's eugenics", "no designer babies", etc. crowds to have any more ammo to oppose the progress of treatments that could actually eliminate congenital diseases.