SoylentNews

Netflix Pulls Episode of Show After Saudi Arabia Offended

posted by takyon on Thursday January 03 2019, @04:34AM   
from the oppress-the-world,-make-it-a-better-place dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

Netflix has pulled an episode of Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj from its Saudi Arabian service after a complaint from the Saudi government as the show covers the Saudi Crown Prince's alleged involvement in the brutal murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi and the kingdom's war with Yemen. The Saudi Government cited its anti-cyber law in its removal request, specifically Article 6, which appears to have nothing to do with the content of the show other than that the Saudis are embarrassed. Given the Streisand effect, it is likely that more people will now see the show than otherwise would have.

---

Original Submission

• Re:Thank you, Netflix! Very smart move! (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday January 04 2019, @02:08PM

  by khallow (3766) on Friday January 04 2019, @02:08PM (#782028) Journal

  Depends on your definition of "works" but, yes, money has very real and powerful effects on human behavior.

  By any reasonable definition of "works".

  Does it "work" to the benefit of the majority of the human population? I believe an objective analysis would say: no.

  Does said "objective analysis" actually exist? Or are you handwaving again? I'll note as a counterpoint that billions of people successfully use money every day to fulfill their wants - an objective analysis you seem to ignore completely.

  The key value of money is as a medium of exchange.

  Again, a matter of perspective. From the perspective of the pinnacles of power, the key value of money is maintaining stability, the status quo. From the bottom looking up: money gets you food, shelter, things you need to survive.

  What is the point of your perspective, the so-called "pinnacles of power" perspective? And we see that the "bottom looking up" perspective already demonstrates an objective measure of the success of money - "gets you food, shelter, things you need to survive".

  emergent behavior of consensus and cooperation.

  Or, from another perspective: capitulation and compliance.

  Sounds to me like changing your perspective solves the problems of money!

  Money is here to stay because it's too good an idea to die.

  In some forms, for some things, money can be quite useful and even an equitable form of exchange. Many things are too important for money: decisions made surrounding potentially terminal illnesses, procreation, feeding starving children, etc. Things that should be maintained by everyone and provided without charge might include:
  
  breathable air
  
  drinkable water
  
  basic foodstuffs
  
  basic medical care
  
  basic clothing and shelter

  How much of that list are you willing to sacrifice for your feelgoods? As you noted [soylentnews.org], money is an abstraction. One of the really important things it is an abstraction for, is that list above. When you compromise money and arbitrarily shift resources around, you compromise that list above as well. Let's give an example. What is "basic foodstuffs"? Well, some committee will have to decide. Then some agency will allot the basic foodstuffs. And then the games begin. Broccoli farmers will lobby to get more of their produce into the "basic foodstuffs" list for higher profit. Someone will discover that the basic foodstuffs is better as fertilizer than as food, and scam to get many tons of the free fertilizer. The powers-that-be will pinch the pennies so that they have more of their own swag while the public will vote in people who promise more free and better quality food stuffs (a perfect steak on every table every day!). Various additional agencies will be created to incompetently prevent all these abuses.
  
  Then as the wealth of the country is drained to support this ecosystem of theater, there will be less wealth available for the basic foodstuffs and it'll get inevitably pared back to uselessness. Eventually, decades down the road people will starve to death on basic foodstuffs and we'll be back where we are now, except without the ability to feed ourselves.
  
  OTOH, right now anyone can buy anything off that list with money. It works.

  If money was really an imaginary construct then whose imagination made these cryptocurrencies when they weren't needed or had value?

  This song comes to mind...

  Or one could just realize that there was some role that current forms of money weren't filling and that the new cryptocurrencies were. For example, South American currencies that are subject to high levels of inflation.
  
  I'll note from start to finish, your post indicates that the biggest problem with money is your perception of it. The obvious solution thus is to change your perception.

  Parent