Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday January 08 2019, @11:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the einstein-dismisses-india-scientists dept.

BBC:

Some academics at the annual Indian Science Congress dismissed the findings of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein.

Hindu mythology and religion-based theories have increasingly become part of the Indian Science Congress agenda.

But experts said remarks at this year's summit were especially ludicrous.

[...] The head of a southern Indian university cited an old Hindu text as proof that stem cell research was discovered in India thousands of years ago.

G Nageshwar Rao, vice chancellor of Andhra University, also said a demon king from the Hindu religious epic, Ramayana, had 24 types of aircraft and a network of landing strips in modern day Sri Lanka.

Another scientist from a university in the southern state of Tamil Nadu told conference attendees that Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were both wrong and that gravitational waves should be renamed "Narendra Modi Waves" [Narendra Modi is the current Prime Minister of India].


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 09 2019, @03:59PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 09 2019, @03:59PM (#784150)

    No, in the usual context dark matter means some sort of exotic matter at this point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model [wikipedia.org]

    And you have chosen to have your own definition of "matter" different from everyone else, whatever, but stop pushing it like it is standard

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday January 09 2019, @04:01PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 09 2019, @04:01PM (#784151) Journal
    Only because they don't have enough of the rest of the dark matter to cover the perceived gap.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 09 2019, @04:37PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 09 2019, @04:37PM (#784160)

    khallow is using 'matter' where he should be using 'mass', but other than that minor difference in terminology, he is pretty much entirely correct.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 09 2019, @07:13PM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 09 2019, @07:13PM (#784231)

      Yes, I know. That is the topic of discussion. Here is what I said above:

      Mass isnt synonymous with matter

      Khallow dont agree.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 14 2019, @06:53AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 14 2019, @06:53AM (#786325)

        Khallow dont agree.

        That amounts to less than nothing, since khallow is not a scientist, or astrophysicist, or meretrician or opthamologist. Khallow is just, khallow, a teenager who has read Ayn Rand, and can't get her out of his pants. So sad, too bad. Poor khallow. Sometimes, suicide is the only honorable way out. That, or accepting that as an non-communalist, you still have to accept Medicare and Social Security, because the Commies prevented you from having a pony at your twelve birthday, so something like that.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday January 21 2019, @06:17AM (2 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 21 2019, @06:17AM (#789424) Journal

        Mass isnt synonymous with matter

        Khallow dont agree.

        And I don't agree because the distinction is meaningless. Everything with mass has volume (and hence, checks off all the boxes for "matter")? Nor when we actually look at cosmological scales does the actual volume of would-be matter become relevant. For example, global clusters, large clumps of stars, which sometimes have billions of stars in them, can orbit for long periods of time without a collision occurring (for example, we have yet to observe such a collision in the globular clusters that we can see with the human eye, which is several centuries worth of observation over several dozen huge clusters). The volume of the matter in the global clusters from the stars is a minuscule portion of the volume of the globular cluster.

        I don't believe in paying lip service to pedantic semantics when it's irrelevant to the topic.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:42AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:42AM (#789953)

          Everything with mass has volume. Photons have volume. Therefore, photons have mass.

          Corollary: interstellar space has volume. Therefore, interstellar space has mass. No need for dark matter.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:48AM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:48AM (#789954) Journal
            A implies B, doesn't mean B implies A, much less some non sequitur C.