SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
SoylentNews
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/climate/ocean-warming-climate-change.html
Scientists say the world’s oceans are warming far more quickly than previously thought, a finding with dire implications for climate change because almost all the excess heat absorbed by the planet ends up stored in their waters.
A new analysis, published Thursday in the journal Science, found that the oceans are heating up 40 percent faster on average than a United Nations panel estimated five years ago. The researchers also concluded that ocean temperatures have broken records for several straight years.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Oceans Warming 40% Faster than Previously Predicted
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 20 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I am two fools, I know, for loving, and for saying so.
-- John Donne
(Score: -1, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Friday January 11 2019, @02:58AM (2 children)
I scrolled through TFA, until the authors stated that today's "trade wars" are a result of this ocean warming. I rolled my eyes, and closed the tab at that point.
The birth of a three legged chick? The result of global warming!
An increase in disease(s)? Global warming!
A decrease in disease(s)? Global warming!
Flood? Global warming!
Drought? Global warming!
“The only thing that never changes is that everything changes.”
― Louis L'Amour
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 11 2019, @04:19AM
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/globalwarming2.html [whatreallyhappened.com]
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 11 2019, @01:27PM
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6423/128.full [sciencemag.org]
I don't see "trade wars" anywhere... and the linked NYT article talks about current impacts, like trade wars in South China Sea, for example. I know you live under the rock, but the world is more than 'murica, and not all conflicts are 'murica centered. Actually, South China Sea is prime example of conflicts where US has abandoned it's ally (Philippines) and now it's almost too late to do anything about it. The actual science article doesn't mention politics or speculates about impacts on human society.
Anyway, TL;DR, the article is just confirmation of measurements that heat is trapped in the oceans, as previously speculated, especially about the "hiatus" in surface temperatures. But I don't expect you to actually read it or understand it.
So, roll your eyes and smoke some weed because you certainly are not gifted with ability to do abstract thought. Or maybe even reading the actual article.