Privacy advocates have been on about how big data and large datasets can be be used against the population for decades. Now key data released by the immigration department may provide the key to bringing barbaric crimes out into the open. Data released by the Government shows thousands of child brides allowed by immigration. Accounts by some of the victims detail how they were used to gain access to America even though they were underage. While some senators have sworn to close the loopholes used to bring child brides into the US we can only expect more of this type of activity to come to light in the future as the public engages in analysis of data released by governments.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 13 2019, @01:05PM (5 children)
They forget the child brides in America, born in America and legally married in America.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States#Statistics [wikipedia.org]
(Score: 5, Interesting) by HiThere on Sunday January 13 2019, @05:51PM
If a 16 year old girl marries a 74 year old man, one may well wonder what their relationship actually is. And in a very large percentage of the referenced cases the older of the two parties was under 21. From the link, sometimes well under 21. I can think of a time when I was about 18 when, if we had been caught, I might have been forced into a marriage with a "child". But that's not the way we thought of it.
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 4, Informative) by hemocyanin on Sunday January 13 2019, @07:24PM (1 child)
Your argument seems to come from a different part of the wikipedia page, specifically: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States#Statistics [wikipedia.org]
Footnote 42 leads to here: https://theconversation.com/child-marriage-is-still-legal-in-the-us-88846 [theconversation.com] (The sentence after FN42 is obviously opinion and gives insight into bias) which contains the following:
That quote contains a link to here: https://www.uncpress.org/book/9781469629537/american-child-bride/ [uncpress.org] which is a blurb for a book stating:
So, even if we were to take that 9% figure at face value (the links end at that blurb and the blurb contains no information on how that figure was obtained), we need to take into account the fact that 9% of all living women in America includes many who were born into an entirely different social climate than exists currently. For example, see this section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States#Statistics [wikipedia.org]
Using "all living women" to prove a point about girls living today seems rather deceptive because the amount of change that occurred between the 50s and 2000 was seismic, and even in a mere 14 years following 2000, the numbers dropped to a sixth of the 2000 level in Alabama. Clearly, today is not last century.
Secondly, that 9% figure includes girls "under 18". I don't feel the same way about a girl who is 17 years and 10 months old getting married compared to one who is 14. For the 17yo, I think "idiot, but whatever, it's your life" -- for the 14yo, "gross, disgusting, manipulated and abused, that's wrong". So not only is that statistic covering women born into a different world ages ago, it is including extra people, people close enough to 18 that it barely matters.
(Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Monday January 14 2019, @10:56AM
This probably needs to be mentioned somewhere in the comments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe [wikipedia.org]
"The vast majority of countries set their ages in the range of 14 to 16".
I would say a large part of what you consider appropriate vs legal is very cultural. Furthermore, most of the time the child brides get better life quality than their parents because men seeking child brides are sought after iff they have a better quality of life than the bride.
The situation is even more complicated because when the 80-year-old husband dies, the child bride and by proxy, her family gets the most legal rights over his property.
I would say that one ought to follow the law of the land, or do enough to get it changed, but then I also think that there is no law that's fair to everyone. I haven't picked a side on that debate yet.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday January 14 2019, @04:03AM
Sounds pretty old to me.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 14 2019, @05:37PM
Fuck off creimer I swear jesus christ please don't start shitting this place up just because you and your one man fanclub got banned from greenchan