Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Wednesday January 16 2019, @04:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the rings-without-tokens dept.

Next-generation LHC: CERN lays out plans for €21-billion super-collider

CERN has unveiled its bold dream to build a new accelerator nearly four times as long as its 27-kilometer Large Hadron Collider—currently the world's largest—and up to six times more powerful.

The European particle physics laboratory, outside Geneva, Switzerland, outlined the plan in a technical report on 15 January.

The document offers several preliminary designs for a Future Circular Collider (FCC)—which would be the most powerful particle-smasher ever built—with different types of colliders ranging in cost from around €9 billion (US$10.2 billion) to €21 billion. It is the lab's opening bid in a priority-setting process over the next two years, called the European Strategy Update for Particle Physics, and it will affect the field's future well into the second half of the century.

[...] Not everyone is convinced the super collider is a good investment. "There is no reason to think that there should be new physics in the energy regime that such a collider would reach," says Sabine Hossenfelder, a theoretical physics at Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies in Germany. "That's the nightmare that everyone has on their mind but doesn't want to speak about."

Hossenfelder says that the large sums involved might be better spent on other types of huge facilities. For example, she says that placing a major radio telescope on the far side of the Moon, or a gravitational-wave detector in orbit, would be safer bets in terms of their return on science.

CERN press release and poster.

Also at The Verge.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by c0lo on Wednesday January 16 2019, @11:08AM (3 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 16 2019, @11:08AM (#787328) Journal

    How could you add "free will" to a computer simulation though?

    Similar with thermal noise in electronic components. The higher the agitation the more probable random bit flips, until... you know... even Trump can get elected. (grin)

    Besides, what makes you believe you have free will now?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Wednesday January 16 2019, @01:54PM

    by deimtee (3272) on Wednesday January 16 2019, @01:54PM (#787367) Journal

    Besides, what makes you believe you have free will now?

    He's programmed to believe it. He doesn't have a choice in the matter.
    On the other hand, I choose to believe free will is an illusion.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 16 2019, @03:57PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 16 2019, @03:57PM (#787413)

    Random/unpredictable-ness isn't the same thing as free will.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday January 17 2019, @03:00AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 17 2019, @03:00AM (#787737) Journal

      Random/unpredictable-ness isn't the same thing as free will.

      You do need a way to incorporate that into your decision making process.