Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday January 21 2019, @10:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the powerful-research dept.

Tiny silicon particles could power lithium ion batteries with 10 times more capacity

University of Alberta chemists have taken a critical step toward creating a new generation of silicon-based lithium ion batteries with 10 times the charge capacity of current cells.

“We wanted to test how different sizes of silicon nanoparticles could affect fracturing inside these batteries,” said Jillian Buriak, a U of A chemist and Canada Research Chair in Nanomaterials for Energy.

Silicon shows promise for building much higher-capacity batteries because it’s abundant and can absorb much more lithium than the graphite used in current lithium ion batteries. The problem is that silicon is prone to fracturing and breaking after numerous charge-and-discharge cycles, because it expands and contracts as it absorbs and releases lithium ions.

The researchers examined silicon nanoparticles of four different sizes, evenly dispersed within highly conductive graphene aerogels, made of carbon with nanoscopic pores, to compensate for silicon’s low conductivity. They found that the smallest particles—just three billionths of a metre in diameter—showed the best long-term stability after many charging and discharging cycles.

[...] “As the particles get smaller, we found they are better able to manage the strain that occurs as the silicon ‘breathes’ upon alloying and dealloying with lithium, upon cycling,” explained Buriak.

[...] The study, “Size and Surface Effects of Silicon Nanocrystals in Graphene Aerogel Composite Anodes for Lithium Ion Batteries,” was published in Chemistry of Materials.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by shrewdsheep on Monday January 21 2019, @01:26PM (1 child)

    by shrewdsheep (5215) on Monday January 21 2019, @01:26PM (#789556)

    I believe you should change your expectations. This is research, so naturally the chance of it getting real is tiny. As a matter of example, consider non-volatile no-moving-parts storage 10-15 yrs ago, we were in a very similar situation. 20 approaches published each year but no real progress. Today we are at the brink of replacing classical hard disks entirely. I find these articles interesting as I better understand where the difficulties are. With batteries there is a myriad of problems it seems, actually more than there were for storage.

  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Monday January 21 2019, @09:15PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Monday January 21 2019, @09:15PM (#789782) Journal

    Yes, this. Takes only one success. We had dozens of ideas for dramatically improving batteries. It's really only a matter of time before we find one that overcomes all the problems and leads to clearly better batteries.

    And we've already seen big improvements. Lithium based battery tech is really not that old. Go back to the mid 1990s, before lithium and nickel metal hydride, and rechargeable was pretty much the province of those horrible NiCads.