Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Tuesday January 22 2019, @01:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the HypeG dept.

The Trump administration’s so-called “race” with China to build new fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks is speeding toward a network vulnerable to Chinese (and other) cyberattacks. So far, the Trump administration has focused on blocking Chinese companies from being a part of the network, but these efforts are far from sufficient. We cannot allow the hype about 5G to overshadow the absolute necessity that it be secure.

[...] “It is imperative that America be first in fifth-generation (5G) wireless technologies,” President Trump wrote in an October Presidential Memorandum of instructions to federal agencies. While the administration, especially the Trump Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.), makes much of how the 5G “race” with China is a matter of national security, not enough effort is being put into the security of the network itself. Nowhere in the president’s directive, for instance, was there a word about protecting the cybersecurity of the new network.

As the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee told him in November[pdf], “the cybersecurity threat now poses an existential threat to the future of the Nation.” Last January, the brightest technical minds in the intelligence community, working with the White House National Security Council (N.S.C.), warned of the 5G cybersecurity threat. When the proposed solutions included security through a federally-owned network backbone, the wireless industry screamed in protest. The chairman of the Trump F.C.C. quickly echoed the industry line that “the market, not government, is best positioned to drive innovation and leadership.” Government ownership may not be practicable, but the concerns in the N.S.C. report have been dismissed too readily.

Worse than ignoring the warnings, the Trump administration has repealed existing protections. Shortly after taking office, the Trump F.C.C. removed a requirement imposed by the Obama F.C.C. that the 5G technical standard must be designed from the outset to withstand cyberattacks. For the first time in history, cybersecurity was being required as a forethought in the design of a new network standard — until the Trump F.C.C. repealed it. The Trump F.C.C. also canceled a formal inquiry seeking input from the country’s best technical minds about 5G security, retracted an Obama-era F.C.C. white paper about reducing cyberthreats, and questioned whether the agency had any responsibility for the cybersecurity of the networks they are entrusted with overseeing.

The simple fact is that our wireless networks are not as secure as they could be because they weren’t designed to withstand the kinds of cyberattacks that are now common. This isn’t the fault of the companies that built the networks, but a reflection that when the standards for the current fourth-generation (4G) technology were set years ago, cyberattacks were not a front-and-center concern.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:36AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:36AM (#789951)

    Considering most USB ports on the phones are hooked up to debug ports I would not worry too much about it. The phone manufactures are the same ones that make the standards and towers.

    Just consider it insecure. Do not put anything of value on the things.

    so bye-bye cheap tech
    Once you realize why all of that junk is made in China you will realize you have been hoodwinked. It is not about cheaper prices. That is a nice side effect. I can build whatever and pass most of the cost onto the consumer. Especially if they *really* want it. Then why? Pollution. The 'cheap tech' is notoriously polluting. A good portion of the united states superfund sites are located in areas around former chip semiconductor processing plants. We are outsourcing our pollution to china. It is easier than dealing with the endless fines. The Chinese just DNGAF about people or pollution unless it embarrasses the people in charge. Then they have ways of dealing with it that would make Stalin blush.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by c0lo on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:53AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday January 22 2019, @03:53AM (#789956) Journal

    Once you realize why all of that junk is made in China you will realize you have been hoodwinked. It is not about cheaper prices.

    Hoodwinked? Me? No way, man.
    I never buy cheap Chinese junk, I always buy the expensive one (large grin).

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford