SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
U.S. insulin costs per patient nearly doubled from 2012 to 2016, study finds
The cost of insulin for treating Type 1 diabetes in the United States nearly doubled over a recent five-year period, underscoring a national outcry over rising drug prices, according to a new analysis.
A patient with Type 1 diabetes incurred annual insulin costs of $5,705, on average, in 2016. The average cost was roughly half that, at $2,864 per patient, in 2012, according to a report released on Tuesday by the nonprofit Health Care Cost Institute.
The figures represent the combined amount paid by a patient and their health plan for the medicine and do not reflect rebates paid at a later date.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
U.S. Insulin Costs Nearly Doubled From 2012 to 2016
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 64 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
To be a kind of moral Unix, he touched the hem of Nature's shift.
-- Shelley
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @07:07PM (6 children)
Sounds like they can't even get basic stuff like a wheelchair or enough beds despite being 15 billion usd in debt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service [wikipedia.org]
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday January 23 2019, @07:32PM (5 children)
The reason the NHS in the UK is struggling is because successive Tory government have under funded it, in an attempt to prove how much better the private sector would be in providing healthcare.
They have already done that to the trains, with the same result. Worse service for more money.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @08:07PM (4 children)
Oh, so centralized/socialized medicine works fine until politics messes it up. Is that what happens?
(Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday January 23 2019, @11:28PM (2 children)
Because politicians who are against it mess it up. You may as well say there's no point to having a lock on your door because a criminal can mess it up with, for example, a can of liquid N2 and a good swift kick.
Of course I know what you were really trying to say/do here, but it doesn't work, so I'm replying to vaccinate anyone unfortunate enough to read your bullshit against the stinkin' thinkin' in your post. FOaD, post-haste.
I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 23 2019, @11:39PM (1 child)
Not a good analogy. It isn't inevitable that someone is going to break the lock. It is inevitable that politicians will mess up whatever it is they try to do and make it 10x more expensive than it needs to be (at least in the US).
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Friday January 25 2019, @02:54PM
What is it about the US that ensures that politicians will mess up whatever it is they try to do and make it 10x more expensive than it needs to be?
Is it something in the constitution that has this effect?
-- hendrik
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday January 24 2019, @01:18AM
Socialized medicine works so well, that once a country tries it, it becomes so popular that it winds up being a political consensus. Any party which offers to dismantle it loses elections. In the case of my country, they lose badly.
The UK has the problem that there is a section of the Conservative party that thinks 1910 was the best time to be alive. And it was if you're the Earl of somewhere, or your Grandfather made a fortune from coal or wool.
They are doing their level best to take Britain back to that time, with the help of people like Rupert Murdoch.