Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Thursday January 24 2019, @10:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the smart-phones-but-no-smart-people dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Emergency declared near Portland for measles outbreak in anti-vaccine hotspot

Health officials in Clark County, Washington have declared a public health emergency for a measles outbreak in an area with a high rate of unvaccinated children.

[...] Nearly eight percent of children in Clark County were exempt from standard vaccination for the 2017-2018 school year, according to state records reported by the Washington Post. Breaking down that eight percent, about seven percent of kids had personal or religious exemptions and the remaining one percent or so had medical exemptions. Factoring in the rest of the population, the county is below the 92 percent to 94 percent range some experts consider required to prevent the spread of highly contagious diseases such as measles.

[...] “It’s really awful and really tragic and totally preventable,” Peter J. Hotez told the Post. Hotez is a professor of pediatrics and dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. “Portland is a total train wreck when it comes to vaccine rates,” he added.

[...] Correction: This article has been updated to correct the state in which Clark County resides. It is in Washington State, not Oregon. 


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by AthanasiusKircher on Thursday January 24 2019, @03:44PM (1 child)

    by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Thursday January 24 2019, @03:44PM (#791255) Journal

    Much of the fear about vaccines came from the mercury preservative additive to vaccines, and the oblivious attitude of the industry to these concerns, rather than the vaccine itself.

    Uh, you mean the fact that the industry has removed the mercury preservative from basically all vaccines given to children? There are a couple vaccines that are still processed with it, but it is removed later and the final vaccines contain only a very tiny amount. The only common vaccine still containing it as a preservative is multi-dose containers of flu vaccine (because they are subject to more potential contamination when used for multiple doses).

    The industry used this preservative in vaccines from the 1930s through the 1990s. There is absolutely no empirical evidence of any bad effects of this chemical at the dosages in vaccines, despite this widespread use and a huge number of studies. In 1999, some organizations recommended removing it where possible as a precautionary measure, given increasing concern about mercury exposure to children in general in the 1990s. And the industry has complied.

    The fact is, I can't blame them for being suspicious

    I can. Or rather, I can't blame them for concern. I can blame them for ignorance and stupidity.

    mercury is a toxin and it really is rather suspicious injecting it into children.

    You know what's suspicious? Feeding tuna to children. It's really suspicious that so many parents feed fish to children, knowing that it contains known toxins.

    You know what's suspicious? Using fluorescent light bulbs in homes and schools. It's really suspicious for so many people to put these devices around kids, knowing that they contain known toxins and a broken bulb could send up a dangerous cloud of mercury vapor.

    Do you think I'm joking? A single can of tuna contains approximately as much mercury as the typical dose of the compound in these vaccines. (And note that fish tends to contain methylmercury compounds which are absorbed faster and are more of a concern than the ethylmercury form in vaccines. So a can of tuna is clearly a greater health concern.) Fluorescent bulbs also contain very little mercury, but when they break, studies have shown they often produce a cloud of mercury vapor in the short term that is more exposure than these vaccines. (There have been cases of kids getting ill from mercury poisoning around broken fluorescent bulbs -- though they are rare; I believe the case I read about was a shed that had a bunch of large old bulbs broken, but still.)

    Dosage is everything. Yes, I agree it's better to produce vaccines without any mercury exposure to kids, but we're also talking about pretty miniscule amounts, introduced for good safety reasons.

    If vaccines did not contain mercury, the vaccine skeptic movement wouldn't be significant. Rather than being anti-vaccine, for many people, its more vaccine skeptic.

    The mark of a true "skeptic" is to question and evaluate ALL evidence presented from ALL sources. A true skeptical attitude would question not only the vaccine industry but whether the mercury dosage is significant, what it compares to, and whether it was introduced for reasonable reasons. Here's [cdc.gov] what the CDC has to say (also signed on by such groups as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Saturday January 26 2019, @02:47PM

    by Bot (3902) on Saturday January 26 2019, @02:47PM (#792305) Journal

    > Uh, you mean the fact that the industry has removed the mercury preservative from basically all vaccines given to children?

    has removed or has never put?

    --
    Account abandoned.