Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday January 27 2019, @04:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the Ultima-Thule dept.

New Horizons' Newest and Best-Yet View of Ultima Thule

Obtained with the wide-angle Multicolor Visible Imaging Camera (MVIC) component of New Horizons' Ralph instrument, this image was taken when the KBO was 4,200 miles (6,700 kilometers) from the spacecraft, at 05:26 UT (12:26 a.m. EST) on Jan. 1 – just seven minutes before closest approach. With an original resolution of 440 feet (135 meters) per pixel, the image was stored in the spacecraft's data memory and transmitted to Earth on Jan. 18-19. Scientists then sharpened the image to enhance fine detail. (This process – known as deconvolution – also amplifies the graininess of the image when viewed at high contrast.)

The oblique lighting of this image reveals new topographic details along the day/night boundary, or terminator, near the top. These details include numerous small pits up to about 0.4 miles (0.7 kilometers) in diameter. The large circular feature, about 4 miles (7 kilometers) across, on the smaller of the two lobes, also appears to be a deep depression. Not clear is whether these pits are impact craters or features resulting from other processes, such as "collapse pits" or the ancient venting of volatile materials.

MVIC (Ralph) has a lower resolution than LORRI, which should have taken its best images at around 30-35 meters per pixel.

(486958) 2014 MU69.

Also at Spaceflight Now, BBC, and TechCrunch.

Previously: Final Planning for the New Horizons Flyby of 2014 MU69 (Ultima Thule) Underway
New Horizons Survives Flyby, Begins Sending Back Data
New Images Reveal Structure, Color, and Features of 2014 MU69 (Ultima Thule)
Animation Shows Rotation of 2014 MU69 (Ultima Thule)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 27 2019, @06:46AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 27 2019, @06:46AM (#792569)

    Why not include the actual source?

    http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-Article.php?page=20190124 [jhuapl.edu]

    Or does bbc and techcrunch have special insights?
    Wikipedia is often comprehensive, yet not always reliable.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by takyon on Sunday January 27 2019, @07:03AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday January 27 2019, @07:03AM (#792574) Journal

    That is the very first link in the summary, bro.

    Proof [soylentnews.org]

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]