Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday January 28 2019, @02:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the In-USA-UAVs-watch-YOU! dept.

The Pentagon deployed drones 11 times throughout the 2018 fiscal year. That's the same number they deployed from 2011 to 2017 combined. The drones varied from civilian drones to military strike aircraft, and they were used for disaster relief, reconnaissance and everything in-between.

New data published by the Pentagon has revealed when drones were used, what they were used for and how long their missions lasted. Over half of the missions fell under the "Defense Support of Civil Authorities," which only became viable this year after the Secretary of Defense removed oversight requirements.

[...] In total, there were three year-long missions and eight short-term missions which lasted an average of three months each.

Hellfires helping homefires between disaster relief and reconnaissance?

Don't forget to register and license those homebrew hoverers, hmmm?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DannyB on Monday January 28 2019, @04:56PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 28 2019, @04:56PM (#793082) Journal

    The drones varied from civilian drones to military strike aircraft, and they were used for disaster relief, reconnaissance and everything in-between.

    It would be interesting to see just how far politicians could stretch the meaning of disaster relief.

    Sort of like stretching the meaning of "national emergency". For example, 9/11 was a national emergency. The people of the US rallied behind the president whether they voted for him or not. Democrats and Republicans stood united on the capital steps and sang God Bless America. In a real national emergency, there is close to unanimous support for the efforts to do something to rectify it.

    Now "national emergency" can mean anything the president wants, even if there is deep division, or even majority opposition.

    We've already seen how "terrorism" is the magical card to grant emergency powers, the PATRIOT act, create TSA to search for nail clippers. Stand back! I'm going to take over the plane with my nail clippers! CLIP! CLIP CLIP!!! Stand back I say! Nobody could possibly overpower me with my trusty nail clippers!

    I can't want to see what they can do with "Disaster Relief".

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 1) by DmT on Monday January 28 2019, @05:40PM

    by DmT (6439) on Monday January 28 2019, @05:40PM (#793112)

    Even more disturbing is that I have to give my fingerprints when I get my travel passport - in a totally different country than the US, just because - maybe I want to visit the US some day and the US requires that, so my (US military protection enjoying) country also requires that.

    Additionally, my one blade Gillette blades get confiscated most of the time in European flights - perhaps I will shave some (terrorists) beard off with them during flight and cause a calamity? :P