Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday January 30 2019, @08:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the chickens-coming-home-to-roost dept.

Google has appealed its case with Oracle to the Supreme Court of the United States over a dispute about whether a java API may be copyrighted.

The ARS Technica Story: Google asks Supreme Court to overrule disastrous ruling on API copyrights.

The consensus among the comments on ARS seem to be that this will result in a substantial amount of litigation. I'm forced to ask whether this future litigation should have happened already, and that this paradigm shift is just a matter of catching up to the effects of a previous bad ruling Lotus v. Borland from the early 1990s.

I get that it is going to cause a lot of code refactoring. But won't that also create a lot of new products? The other thing to consider is that communications protocols are essentially API specifications. Historically intellectual property protection for protocols is very weak. Some (myself at least) would attribute the effectiveness of the EEE business tactic to the inability to defend protocol compatibility within the legal framework provided by the USPTO and Copyright Office.

Which is to say that an Oracle victory may expand the scope of FOSS licensing, giving FOSS developers more say over how their products are used. This would reduce barrier to entry in new communications product markets that are based on FOSS, and give more power to startups.

Yes it is going to be expensive for established players if Oracle wins. Most people seem to agree with that. That is the price of operating on a bad premise. Does it matter whether responsibility for the premise resides with a judge or a CEO? Aren't there also some upsides if Oracle wins? What are the trade offs?

Of course the whole thing could be a put on.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 30 2019, @01:30PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 30 2019, @01:30PM (#794035)

    Huh?
    Bars here sell all kinds of stuff way stronger than that.
    You're confusing bar with grocery store. You can't buy anything at the grocery store including cooking sherry if it contains more than 3.2% alcohol. For that you need to go to the liquor store and yes those are state run.

    There has been quite a bit of push back though on this and change is in the air as the state begins to realize what an embarrassment it is to force a professional chef to go to a state owned liquor store just to get a cooking wine. Or to have the zion curtain where the bartender in a restaurant cannot be visible to seated patrons lest they see him pour liqour into a glass as part of someone's meal.

    A large part of this is the fault of the LDS church, but keep in mind there are entire counties outside of Utah that are completely dry and they have nothing to do with being Mormon. Puritans gotta be holier than thou and Teatotallers gotta teatotal.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 30 2019, @04:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 30 2019, @04:26PM (#794104)

    According to wiki, beer only bars are restricted to 3.2% beer too.

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Wednesday January 30 2019, @06:01PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday January 30 2019, @06:01PM (#794156)

    When I was in Utah visiting my sister a few years ago, all we could get in local bars was 3.2 beer. From what I understand there have been efforts to loosen the rules, but it's not like this isn't a real issue.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday January 30 2019, @10:38PM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Wednesday January 30 2019, @10:38PM (#794268) Homepage Journal

    Nova Scotia outlawed opening large stores on Sundays until I think 2005 when some worth-his-every-loonie attorney conceived of subdividing each large store among a whole bunch of really small stores.

    The province still didn’t want to legalize Sunday shopping but relented due to the absurdity of everyone Sunday shopping anyway.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]