Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday January 30 2019, @08:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the blame-it-on-the-guy-with-a-blue-ox? dept.

Joshua Tree national park 'may take 300 years to recover' from shutdown

The former superintendent of Joshua Tree national park has said it could take hundreds of years to recover from damage caused by visitors during the longest-ever government shutdown.

"What's happened to our park in the last 34 days is irreparable for the next 200 to 300 years," Curt Sauer said at a rally over the weekend, according to a report from the Desert Sun. Sauer retired in 2010 after running the park for seven years.

The park reopened Monday after the record 35-day shutdown, and park workers returned to a state of chaos, including damaged trees, graffiti and ruined trails. The reduced ranger supervision during the shutdown saw increased vandalism at the park, causing officials to announce on 8 January that Joshua Tree would temporarily close. It was announced a day later that officials were able to use recreation fee revenue to avoid the closure.

"While the vast majority of those who visit Joshua Tree do so in a responsible manner, there have been incidents of new roads being created by motorists and the destruction of Joshua trees in recent days that have precipitated the closure," said park spokesman George Land in the news release.

Joshua Tree National Park.

Related: Cost to Enter National Parks Will More Than Double


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Thursday January 31 2019, @12:54AM (1 child)

    by NewNic (6420) on Thursday January 31 2019, @12:54AM (#794316) Journal

    California needs to put some provisions in place for when this happens again, because you *know* it'll happen again.

    Yes, because the state of California runs the national parks within its borders. LOL.

    --
    lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by istartedi on Thursday January 31 2019, @01:28AM

    by istartedi (123) on Thursday January 31 2019, @01:28AM (#794323) Journal

    I guess you're not aware of how Arizona handles things. [eacourier.com], to which I alluded. While neither state *ordinarily* runs the National Parks, there doesn't appear to be anything to bar states from taking over when the Federal government abdicates its responsibilities. There is, AFAIK, nothing that legally prevents California from modeling its approach after Arizona's.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.