Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday January 30 2019, @08:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the blame-it-on-the-guy-with-a-blue-ox? dept.

Joshua Tree national park 'may take 300 years to recover' from shutdown

The former superintendent of Joshua Tree national park has said it could take hundreds of years to recover from damage caused by visitors during the longest-ever government shutdown.

"What's happened to our park in the last 34 days is irreparable for the next 200 to 300 years," Curt Sauer said at a rally over the weekend, according to a report from the Desert Sun. Sauer retired in 2010 after running the park for seven years.

The park reopened Monday after the record 35-day shutdown, and park workers returned to a state of chaos, including damaged trees, graffiti and ruined trails. The reduced ranger supervision during the shutdown saw increased vandalism at the park, causing officials to announce on 8 January that Joshua Tree would temporarily close. It was announced a day later that officials were able to use recreation fee revenue to avoid the closure.

"While the vast majority of those who visit Joshua Tree do so in a responsible manner, there have been incidents of new roads being created by motorists and the destruction of Joshua trees in recent days that have precipitated the closure," said park spokesman George Land in the news release.

Joshua Tree National Park.

Related: Cost to Enter National Parks Will More Than Double


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by AthanasiusKircher on Thursday January 31 2019, @04:43AM (2 children)

    by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Thursday January 31 2019, @04:43AM (#794400) Journal

    They should just pass a state law that all National Parks default to closure during shutdowns...

    You are probably aware of this, but others may not be: generally the National Parks *do* close during shutdowns. The Trump Administration made a deliberate decision to keep them open while unstaffed, a completely irresponsible policy. Why they didn't also order the doors of the Smithsonian to be flung open while the staff went home, I don't know -- it would make as much sense.

    Of course this was all playing politics. Despite our President claiming to own the shutdown and be proud of it, the national park closures became an issue in past shutdowns, so he clearly hoped to avoid bad press... and this is what we got for it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Informative=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Thursday January 31 2019, @10:48AM

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Thursday January 31 2019, @10:48AM (#794476) Homepage Journal

    You say "unstaffed." That's a horrible horrible lie. From the DUMB MEME that's going around on internet. Look at Summery -- "reduced ranger supervision." We kept a minimum staff. NOT ZERO!!!!!

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday January 31 2019, @01:59PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 31 2019, @01:59PM (#794516) Journal
    The Trump policy worked just fine in Yellowstone National Park. And it's not true that national parks always close during shutdowns (you're already complaining about an exception that proves you wrong!). It's depends on the situation and how much political advantage there is to shutting the parks down. Obama, for example, had much more restrictive rules in place at Yellowstone during the "Sequester" [wikipedia.org], but he was in a favorable position where exaggerating the shutdown worked to his benefit. I thought I wrote about this earlier, but in the 2013 shutdown, we in Yellowstone had the "no fun" (my term) rules which went from common sense and nose-dived into stupidity. To paraphrase from memory:

    1) Hiking is prohibited during the shutdown. [makes sense - nobody to save you when you run into trouble]
    2) Travel allowed for essential reasons. [makes sense] And you can't stop at a pull off to take in a nice view, animal, or snap a picture. [huh?]
    3) You can only leave the park either to leave the park indefinitely or conduct essential tasks (like buying food). No leaving the park to see a movie. [unless of course, you don't tell the ranger at the gate that you're doing that!]

    The shutdown didn't require the various parties in the party to not have fun. That was just some bureaucrats being dicks.

    I think the point here is that not that there's some imaginary law that forces the president to deny popular services when it's not in his or her interests to do so, but rather that they have a lot of leeway in how much they make such shutdowns hurt. Such things can be played up as well as played down.