Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday February 02 2019, @10:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-look-at-me-that-way dept.

San Francisco could become the first U.S. city to ban the use of facial recognition technology, criticized as biased by lawmakers and privacy advocates.

A new bill unveiled on Tuesday, known as the Stop Secret Surveillance Ordinance, states that the risks of the controversial technology "substantially outweigh...its purported benefits, and the technology will exacerbate racial injustice and threaten our ability to live free of continuous government monitoring."

https://foxnews.com/tech/san-francisco-could-ban-facial-recognition-technology-becoming-first-us-city-to-do-so


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday February 03 2019, @11:09PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Sunday February 03 2019, @11:09PM (#795864) Journal

    Rigging it may have been, but if Sanders had another 5-10% of support, and Clinton had made more early gaffes, maybe Sanders would have defeated the DNC and become the nominee. But he didn't have enough support.

    He didn't overcome the challenge of a rigged playing field, which would only have led to yet another challenge of convincing the American public to vote for a "Democratic Socialist". The same public that ultimately picked Trump over Clinton (popular vote notwithstanding).

    I think any damage caused by Trump to this point is repairable. The biggest deal has been his Supreme Court nominations. If he gets one more, that will make a huge difference.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Sunday February 03 2019, @11:15PM

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Sunday February 03 2019, @11:15PM (#795867) Journal

    Ginsburg is effectively already dead, and there's already a 6-3 majority of hard-right neocons on the court. THIS is why I held my nose and voted D; the Judiciary in general, and the SCOTUS in particular, is a massive vulnerability in the US government, in that a successful partisan hijack can cripple the other two branches for decades on end. Even if Trump had turned out to be perfectly capable and principled, I *still* would have voted against him specifically so that he couldn't pack the court. The GOP understands the above very well, and it's why they stalled out Merrick Garland, who himself isn't exactly another Justice Sotomayer...

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...