Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday February 04 2019, @01:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the playing-halo-at-work dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Move over trust falls and ropes courses, turns out playing video games with coworkers is the real path to better performance at the office.

A new study by four BYU information systems professors found newly-formed work teams experienced a 20 percent increase in productivity on subsequent tasks after playing video games together for just 45 minutes. The study, published in AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, adds to a growing body of literature finding positive outcomes of team video gaming.

"To see that big of a jump -- especially for the amount of time they played -- was a little shocking," said co-author and BYU associate professor Greg Anderson. "Companies are spending thousands and thousands of dollars on team-building activities, and I'm thinking, go buy an Xbox."

For the study, researchers recruited 352 individuals and randomly organized them into 80 teams, making sure no participants with pre-existing relationships were on the same team. For their initial experimental task, each team played in a geocaching competition called Findamine, an exercise created by previous IS researchers which gives players short, text-based clues to find landmarks. Participants were incentivized with cash rewards for winning the competition.

[...] The researchers found that while the goal-training teams reported a higher increase in team cohesion than the video-gaming teams, the video gamers increased actual performance on their second round of Findamine significantly, raising average scores from 435 to 520.

"Team video gaming may truly be a viable -- and perhaps even optimal -- alternative for team building," said lead researcher Mark Keith, associate professor of information systems at BYU.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by c0lo on Monday February 04 2019, @03:32AM (1 child)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 04 2019, @03:32AM (#795971) Journal

    Pay more, you'll get better results.

    Only goes that much.
    Yes, fair pay for the fair work is a must. But once the limit** of the payee to deliver more is reached, extra pay doesn't help any more.

    ---

    ** if not earlier.
    Speaking for myself, once what I need in terms of wage is delivered, I might put my back for 1-4 weeks of crunch time now and then to get over hurdle, but I'm not gonna spit blood working extra on daily basis no matter how much you'll pay.
    If you are not going to pay for what I feel I need, fair enough, I'm not gonna work for you, full stop.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Rivenaleem on Tuesday February 05 2019, @02:30PM

    by Rivenaleem (3400) on Tuesday February 05 2019, @02:30PM (#796671)

    Parent post is a good summary of Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory. You can read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_theory [wikipedia.org]