Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Thursday February 07 2019, @07:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the 🌮 dept.

Emoji 12.0 brings us waffles, more diversity, suggestive "finger pinch" glyph

There's a push for more diversity with this new emoji release. We have emojis for deaf people in three genders (male, female, and genderless) and five skin tones, an ear with a hearing aid, people in motorized and unmotorized wheelchairs, prosthetic arms and legs, a guide dog and a service dog, and people with a probing cane. There are actually only 59 distinct new emoji types in this release, but everything that depicts a human comes in five skin tones and three genders, which pumps up the numbers. You can really see this with the "People holding hands" emoji, which is completely configurable for a total of 70 possible combinations.

The emoji that's causing the most buzz is "pinching hand." Emojipedia's example shows a thumb and pointer finger with a small distance between them, which could also be interpreted as a hand signal for "small." People are already coming up with, uh, "suggestive" uses for such a glyph, and if the actual implementations follow Emojipedia's design, the glyph could end up on the naughty list next to peach and eggplant.

Thank you, Emojesus. ✝

By the way, what happened to calling it Unicode 12.0? Maybe they'll call it that in June.

Unicode Consortium blog post. Also at Emojipedia and 9to5Mac.

Previously: 38 New Emojis to be Introduced in 2016
Unicode Considering 67 New Emoji for 2016
Unicode 9.0 Serves up Bacon Emoji, 71 others, and Six New Scripts
Unicode 10.0's New Emojis
Stink Over Frowning Poo Emoji at the Unicode Consortium

Related: Apple's New iPhone X will let You Control the Poo Emoji with Your Face
Google CEO Drops Everything to Fix Cheeseburger Emoji
Microsoft Briefly Left Holding the Gun Emoji
Battle of the Bagel Emoji


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by progo on Thursday February 07 2019, @08:30AM (7 children)

    by progo (6356) on Thursday February 07 2019, @08:30AM (#797671) Homepage

    Is the Unicode Consortium collecting fees for processing requests to add these emoji codepoints? Without looking into it right now, I'm guessing yes that's the only explanation for the huge number we have now.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07 2019, @08:47AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07 2019, @08:47AM (#797674)

    No. It's every SJW wanting their own emoji for whatever gender they think they are.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07 2019, @01:39PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07 2019, @01:39PM (#797749)

    Follow the money.
    Or follow the logic. If possible.

    Why is there a female terrorist emoji [emojipedia.org] but no male terrorist emoji?

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday February 07 2019, @03:05PM (3 children)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday February 07 2019, @03:05PM (#797779) Homepage
      It's formally "person with headscarf", merely defaulting to female. There exists, through gender composition (using the ZJW character between the two components), a clearly defined encoding for "man with headscarf" https://emojipedia.org/man-with-headscarf/

      Incidentally - check the facebook rendering of the woman with headscarf at your link, I personally find it hilarious!

      Anyway, good dogwhistling, you bigot, it efficiently managed to draw the attention of someone who was swiftly able to prove you wrong.

      But on the flipside, don't get me wrong, not all cultures are equal, and my views on headscarves are neatly summarised by these ex-wearers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVpZ0FZc8SY
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07 2019, @05:30PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 07 2019, @05:30PM (#797853)

        through gender composition (using the ZJW character between the two components)

        Zero Justice Warrior?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 08 2019, @02:30AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 08 2019, @02:30AM (#798112)

        You make a good point. That emoji carries the meanings of "bigot" and "intolerance" around here. Based on how people who dress like that act.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 08 2019, @05:37PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 08 2019, @05:37PM (#798425)

        Man with headscarf looks kawaii.

        Facebook woman with headscarf looks like a cartoon fish.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Thursday February 07 2019, @07:02PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday February 07 2019, @07:02PM (#797884) Journal

    Women finally get a menstruation emoji [fastcompany.com]

    The menstruation emoji was one fought for by Plan International U.K., a girls’ rights charity that held an online vote for what such an emoji should look like, reports the BBC.

    While the vote decided menstruation should be represented with an emoji that was a pair of underwear marked with blood, that idea was rejected by the Unicode Consortium. Instead, the new menstruation emoji will take the form of a single drop of blood, an alternative Plan International U.K. supports.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]