SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A group of researchers is calling for the retraction of more than 400 scientific papers after a first-of-its-kind study that claims countless human organs were unethically harvested from prisoners in China.
The study, which was published in the journal BMJ Open and led by Australian researchers, highlights a facet of scientific ethics that does not receive a lot of attention. Namely, that many English-language academic journals do not follow international ethics rules over donor consent for organ transplants.
“There’s no real pressure from research leaders on China to be more transparent,” Wendy Rogers, a professor of clinical ethics at Macquarie University and the study’s author, told the Guardian. “Everyone seems to say, ‘It’s not our job.’ The world’s silence on this barbaric issue must stop.”
[...] The study looked at research papers published from January 2000 until April 2017. Researchers identified 445 studies involving 85,477 transplants. A staggering 92.5 percent failed to report whether or not organs were sourced from executed prisoners, while 99 percent failed to report that organ sources gave consent for transplantation.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday February 08 2019, @04:41PM
Being denied freedom is something different than being denied organs, or denied life.
There may be some way denying any of these can be done under the law. But that is not the same as arbitrarily substituting one punishment for another.
If you're going to harvest prisoner's organs, then spell it out under the law. Don't dance around it. Don't do it in secret. Try bringing it out in the bright light of day. A government either thinks this is a good idea or a bad idea. Let's make it transparently clear.
To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.