Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday February 14 2019, @12:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the getting-a-leg-up dept.

Lufthansa sues passenger who skipped his flight

A method commonly used by airline passengers to get cheaper fares is at the center of a court row between a German airline and one of its customers.

Lufthansa has taken a passenger, who didn't show up for the last leg of his ticketed journey, to court in an apparent bid to clamp down on "hidden city" ticketing. The practice involves passengers leaving their journey at a layover point, instead of making a final connection.

For instance, someone flying from New York to San Francisco could book a cheaper trip from New York to Lake Tahoe with a layover in San Francisco and get off there, without bothering to take the last leg of the flight.

The unnamed passenger skipped a flight from Frankfurt to Oslo and flew using a separate Lufthansa reservation from Frankfurt to Berlin instead. Lufthansa is calling this a violation of their terms and conditions and has sued the passenger for €2,112 ($2,386).

This method does not work if you have checked bags, and other people have reported retaliation from airlines for the practice.

Also at Fortune and Popular Mechanics.

See also: Airlines hate 'hidden city ticketing,' but it's still one of the best ways to save a ton on your flights — if you know how to do it
Travel Site CEO's Reddit AMA Backfires When Redditors Turn on Him


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by bob_super on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:13AM (6 children)

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:13AM (#800812)

    The main negative is IF their system isn't designed YET, in 2019, to quickly check whether a missing checked-in passenger has luggage loaded on the plane. Someone has to check, then potentially address a waiting list, which takes time.

    A fully boarded plane can get pushed off the gate, and potentially take off, early. Waiting for a passenger until the last call and the last minute is negating any effort made to board early. Those minutes are what Low-Cost airlines rely on to keep costs down (LH isn't low-cost, but any time savings are money). Crews can also ease into flight mode with the extra time, potentially enhancing safety.

    I don't think the airline should win, but I think people should have the courtesy to invest a minute or five to tell the company that they won't take a connection they are checked-in for. Waste will show up on everyone's ticket prices eventually.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by RandomFactor on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:18AM (2 children)

    by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:18AM (#800817) Journal

    Except doing them the courtesy can get you noticed.

    --
    В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:50AM (1 child)

      by bob_super (1357) on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:50AM (#800828)

      Because missing the flight you're checked in for doesn't ?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n5E7feJHw0 [youtube.com]

      • (Score: 2) by RandomFactor on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:14AM

        by RandomFactor (3682) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:14AM (#800860) Journal

        So your position is that being one of the blurred masses that say nothing every day about missing a flight is more noticeable than being one of the comparatively small group that say "Hi, I need to cancel the second leg of the flight because -bogus reason-. No i don't need a later flight. No I don't need help with flight arrangements home. Thanks, I'm good."

        Bold take.

        Don't misunderstand more, I'm all for courtesy far beyond what is common. Still, If you don't want to be noticed, staying with the herd is often the higher percentage approach.

        --
        В «Правде» нет известий, в «Известиях» нет правды
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:15AM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:15AM (#800861)

    I think it was LH, might have been KLM, anyway: 1995-ish London to Amsterdam hop, by some fluke of my routing first class cost the same as coach, so I was in first. We were served a nice lunch while the attendants tossed bags of nuts at the passengers in coach - everybody knows that. What I didn't know until that flight was that we had been flying a level holding pattern _until_ the gentleman in 2A finished his lunch (he was the last to finish), he wiped his chin with his linen napkin and set it down... the stewardess was discretely watching him and the moment his napkin touched the china plate she pressed a button, a bell went off in the cockpit and we immediately banked and began our descent - followed momentarily by the typical cabin announcement (in German or Dutch first, then English) "Ladies and Gentlemen, we have begun our descent into...."

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:00PM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:00PM (#801040) Homepage
    Given that most people think that what the airlines are doing is fucked up, how about it gets formally recognised as being fucked up and against the interest of a fair marketplace? How about having consumer protection laws (shock horror, I know that most US readers will have stopped reading already as they are either unfamiliar with the concept, or else view it as government being too invasive and getting in the way of business) that forbid charging less for more. If you can buy X+Y for $A and X for $A+B, then the consumer should have the right to buy X for $A. Effectively it forbids anything from having negative cost (in this case Y, having cost $-B).

    Similar laws (related to alcohol) work well in parts of northern Europe (the tax-all-sins parts, predictably).
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 2) by PocketSizeSUn on Friday February 15 2019, @12:09AM

    by PocketSizeSUn (5340) on Friday February 15 2019, @12:09AM (#801291)

    to quickly check whether a missing checked-in passenger has luggage loaded on the plane

    Been in place for decades ... think 'terrorist checked a bomb in his luggage and didn't board the plane'.
    Again .. been in place for *decades* now.