Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the squeak-now-or-forever-hold-your-grease dept.

The text of Article13 and the EU Copyright Directive has just been finalised and it's utterly awful. It is clear what we do now: contact MEPs and get them to vote down the entire package.

https://juliareda.eu/2019/02/eu-copyright-final-text/

Our best bet: The final vote in the plenary of the European Parliament, when all 751 MEPs, directly elected to represent the people, have a vote. This will take place either between March 25 and 28, on April 4 or between April 15 and 18. We've already demonstrated last July that a majority against a bad copyright proposal is achievable.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @02:52AM (13 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @02:52AM (#800851)

    Solution is to leave the EU, it seems to be a toxic organization.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Troll=1, Insightful=3, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:13AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:13AM (#800858)

    to the most restrictive version. The tried and true ratchet mechanism, works every time.

    You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. Displaying this line will need a paid license.

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by c0lo on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:15AM (9 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @03:15AM (#800862) Journal

    We’ve already demonstrated last July that a majority against a bad copyright proposal is achievable.

    Maybe it is one solution to this problem. Maybe not - there's no warranty that each of the states, on their own, can resist better on the copyright assault. Hint: neither have the US states on their own managed to do better

    ----

    On the other side (with me doing what the editors should have done and providing the original text links included)

    We’ve already demonstrated last July [technollama.co.uk] that a majority against a bad copyright proposal is achievable.

    A thing that clearly demonstrates that other proper solutions do exist.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:20AM (2 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:20AM (#800889) Journal

      Hint: neither have the US states on their own managed to do better

      Because they can't by the constraints of the Constitution.

      • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday February 14 2019, @07:04PM (1 child)

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday February 14 2019, @07:04PM (#801112) Journal

        The constitution would not prevent us to returning to the definition of "limited time" that we used in the past.

        I think most of the problems would be resolved if we just made "limited time" equal to five or ten years.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday February 15 2019, @12:36AM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday February 15 2019, @12:36AM (#801305) Journal

          The constitution would not prevent us to returning to the definition of "limited time" that we used in the past.

          I agree we should have done that long ago, but that doesn't give the states the power to do so on their own initiative.

    • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:43AM (5 children)

      by Sulla (5173) on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:43AM (#800895) Journal

      The closer government is to you the easier it is to control. Chances of failing to get something passed in the federal legislature is much higher than at the state level.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by c0lo on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:51AM (4 children)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @05:51AM (#800897) Journal

        The closer government is to you the easier it is to control.

        Really? My first 20+ years of life (under a communist regime) tells me the opposite: the farthest the government is from me, the easier is to control my life.
        And if I can have enough control on my life, I really don't give a a damn'd piss over the government.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @09:51AM (3 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @09:51AM (#800925)

          yes! "Fuck you, I got mine!" is the principle we should all live on.

          corruption worked in "communist" countries in the sense that the countries went to shit and the eastern block is still struggling to fix systemic problems in industry and infrastructure 30 years after the supposed regime changes happened.
          and yes, by corruption I mean a system where individual people don't give a shit about the government because they have their local network of "friends" and black market that gives them a facsimile of a reasonable life. The simple fact that the USSR collapsed is proof that such a system does not function.

          In Belgium, where they are properly civilized, the country survived for years (~2010) without a central government because they had a strong legal system in place, and authority was divided between different entities such that a corrupted system did not take over.
          We need the EU to set up the solid legal foundation that local governments can function on. As long as that solid foundation is stable and enforced, it's true that the EU leadership can take a break (just like the belgian central government).
          This article13 thing wants to go into the solid foundation, and we need to keep it out.
          If you don't have anything constructive to add to the discussion, at least don't pollute it with defective ideas.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @10:19AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @10:19AM (#800934)

            "Fuck you, I got mine!"

            It has already been decided that you are one of these people, btw. How many bars of soap in your village?

          • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday February 14 2019, @11:19AM

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @11:19AM (#800959) Journal

            This article13 thing wants to go into the solid foundation, and we need to keep it out.
            If you don't have anything constructive to add to the discussion, at least don't pollute it with defective ideas.

            Really now, read once again the whole thread, including this [soylentnews.org].
            Maybe you'll understand that I don't oppose governance, just have a low opinion on the government as a mean for governance.

            One can hope you also see a distinction between legislative and executive, or is it too much to ask?

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:06PM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 14 2019, @01:06PM (#800983) Journal

            yes! "Fuck you, I got mine!" is the principle we should all live on.

            That straw man was coming right for us!

            If you don't have anything constructive to add to the discussion, at least don't pollute it with defective ideas.

            Good idea.

  • (Score: 2) by stretch611 on Thursday February 14 2019, @09:45AM (1 child)

    by stretch611 (6199) on Thursday February 14 2019, @09:45AM (#800921)

    From the article:

    The anti-EU far right is trying to seize this opportunity to promote their narrow-minded nationalist agenda – when in fact without the persistent support of the far-right ENF Group (dominated by the Rassemblement/Front National) the law could have been stopped in the crucial Legal Affairs Committee and in general would not be as extreme as it is today.

    So basically, support the far right groups to leave the EU, and watch as those same groups try to turn your democracies into authoritarian governments.

    What can go wrong with that?

    --
    Now with 5 covid vaccine shots/boosters altering my DNA :P
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @09:53AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14 2019, @09:53AM (#800926)

      So authoritarians (people who want to tell everyone what to do, and force them to pay for that) on all sides over there?