Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Monday February 25 2019, @09:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-am-happy dept.

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/02/25/697052006/anger-can-be-contagious-heres-how-to-stop-the-spread

In this era of "incite outrage-at-the-moment-to-get-that-click" clickbait news and postings pushed to us by mainstream media and social networks, is it a wonder that society is in the current state that its in..?

This article at NPR states that even if you're not aware of it, it's likely that your emotions will influence someone around you today. This can happen during our most basic exchanges, say on your commute to work. "If someone smiles at you, you smile back at them," says sociologist Nicholas Christakis of Yale University. "That's a very fleeting contagion of emotion from one person to another."

But it doesn't stop there. Emotions can spread through social networks almost like the flu or a cold. And, the extent to which emotions can cascade is eye-opening.

For instance, Christakis' research has shown that if you start to become happier with your life, a friend living close by has a 25 percent higher chance of becoming happy too. And your partner is more likely to feel better as well. The happiness can even spread to people to whom you're indirectly connected.

To document this, Christakis and his colleagues mapped out the face-to-face interactions of about 5,000 people living in one town, over the course of 32 years. Their emotional ups and downs were documented with periodic surveys. "We were able to show that as one person became happy or sad, it rippled through the network," Christakis says.

It's not just happiness that spreads, unhappiness and anger can be contagious, too. Should negative-clickbait be banned as a social threat?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 26 2019, @12:18AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 26 2019, @12:18AM (#806697)

    NPR does little more than re-read AP, Reuters, and BBC and call it their own. They have been doing that for as long as I can remember.

    Once you realize people can buy articles that are little more than advertisements for something. It is not that big of a leap of logic to realize 'news' is fake or at best bought. Every once and awhile you will get a good piece. But many times they are rush jobs with little fact checking if any at all. Got to hit the deadline.

    I wish there was something better, and wouldn't mind even paying for it, if it existed
    Tell me about it... I have been searching for 25+ years.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday February 26 2019, @03:47AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday February 26 2019, @03:47AM (#806763) Journal

    That is informative. I don't think NPR ever goes outside, or meets people. They get all their news right off the screens on their desks. Has anyone ever seen an NPR reporter, or journalist?