Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday February 26 2019, @11:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the BIG-things-in-small-packages dept.

Two companies have announced 1 terabyte microSDXC cards at Mobile World Congress 2019:

Micron's fingernail-sized card uses 96-layer 3D NAND configured as QLC (4bits/cell) storage and delivers up to 100MB/s read and 95MB/s write burst performance helped by a dynamically sized SLC cache.

WD's SanDisk's UHS-I microSDXC, meanwhile, boasts "up to" speeds of 160MB/s reads and 90MB/s writes.

[...] Random IO is up to 4,000 IOPS for reads and 2,000 for writes for both Micron and SanDisk's kit.

The SanDisk 1 TB microSD card will launch at $450 in April, or $200 for a 512 GB version.

The Secure Digital 3.01 specification defines a maximum capacity of 2 TB (2048 GB) for SDXC and microSDXC cards. The Secure Digital 7.0 specification introduced the Secure Digital Ultra Capacity (SDUC) format with a maximum capacity of 128 TB.

Also at Tom's Hardware, The Verge.

See also: 512 GB of UFS 3.0 Storage: Western Digital iNAND MC EU511

Previously: SanDisk Announces a 400 GB MicroSD Card
Half a Terabyte in Your Smartphone? Yup. That's Possible Now
Samsung Announces Production of 1 Terabyte Universal Flash Storage for Smartphones


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Tuesday February 26 2019, @04:05PM (1 child)

    by Freeman (732) on Tuesday February 26 2019, @04:05PM (#806997) Journal

    These will be useful for taking long videos/recording audio and/or storing music/videos. Not much real use for taking pictures. Sure, it's "nice" to have a giant card that you don't ever have to replace. Right up to the point where it dies. Losing all of the pictures you've taken over the last year or two isn't cool. Whereas, if you have a smaller card, you're forced to think about more permanent storage. Another option is to just keep buying bunches of cards, which is much better than one single giant card. I nearly lost an immense number of pictures to that very issue. Thankfully, I was still able to read from the card. It just wouldn't let me write to it. The lock switch wasn't on, etc. I did a bit of research into what the best kind of card is for a camera. Professionals use smaller cards, especially for event shooting, like weddings. That way, if you lose the data on one card, you're not totally screwed.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by opinionated_science on Tuesday February 26 2019, @04:39PM

    by opinionated_science (4031) on Tuesday February 26 2019, @04:39PM (#807026)

    It might be cool, if in future there is a "parallel" write capability on these huge cards.

    E.g. perhaps look like 4 devices and have a software raid.

    Any one with knowledge comment on this possiblity of graceful degredation, vs complete failure?