Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday February 27 2019, @09:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the picture-this dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

How Our Universe Could Emerge as a Hologram

The fabric of space and time is widely believed by physicists to be emergent, stitched out of quantum threads according to an unknown pattern. And for 22 years, they've had a toy model of how emergent space-time can work: a theoretical "universe in a bottle," as its discoverer, Juan Maldacena, has described it.

The space-time filling the region inside the bottle—a continuum that bends and undulates, producing the force called gravity—exactly maps to a network of quantum particles living on the bottle's rigid, gravity-free surface. The interior "universe" projects from the lower-dimensional boundary system like a hologram. Maldacena's discovery of this hologram has given physicists a working example of a quantum theory of gravity.

But that doesn't necessarily mean the toy universe shows how space-time and gravity emerge in our universe. The bottle's interior is a dynamic, Escheresque place called anti–de Sitter (AdS) space that is negatively curved like a saddle. Different directions on the saddle curve in opposite ways, with one direction curving up and the other curving down. The curves tend toward vertical as you move away from the center, ultimately giving AdS space its outer boundary—a surface where quantum particles can interact to create the holographic universe inside. However, in reality, we inhabit a positively curved "de Sitter (dS) space," which resembles the surface of a sphere that's expanding without bounds.

Ever since 1997, when Maldacena discovered the AdS/CFT correspondence — a duality between AdS space and a "conformal field theory" describing quantum interactions on that space's boundary—physicists have sought an analogous description of space-time regions like ours that aren't bottled up. The only "boundary" of our universe is the infinite future. But the conceptual difficulty of projecting a hologram from quantum particles living in the infinite future has long stymied efforts to describe real space-time holographically.

[...] Patrick Hayden, a theoretical physicist and computer scientist at Stanford who studies the AdS/CFT correspondence and its relationship to quantum error correction, said he and other experts are mulling over Dong, Silverstein and Torroba's dS/dS model. He said it's too soon to tell whether insights about how space-time is woven and how quantum gravity works in AdS space will carry over to a de Sitter model. "But there's a path—something to be done," Hayden said. "You can formulate concrete mathematical questions. I think a lot is going to happen in the next few years."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @11:36AM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @11:36AM (#807537)

    Is there a prediction (not postdiction) that comes out of this or not?

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday February 27 2019, @12:29PM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday February 27 2019, @12:29PM (#807555) Journal
    The AdS part would imply negative cosmological constant (and ultimately a collapsing universe). Observations give a positive sign for that.

    There might be some sort of possible verification by showing mass can't be shielded or hidden. That is, if you know the gravitational fields around a mass, you know the distribution of the mass.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @01:43PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @01:43PM (#807589)

      If the predictions of this model are already inconsistent with the observations why do we care? Do they claim the observations are faulty or misinterpreted?

      • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Thursday February 28 2019, @02:17AM

        by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Thursday February 28 2019, @02:17AM (#807933) Homepage Journal

        It's not the prediction in antiDesitter space that's important. They are instead hoping to find analogous math that works in the DeSitter space we inhabit. Then see what that math predicts -- it could be quite different and interesting.

  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday February 27 2019, @03:00PM (1 child)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday February 27 2019, @03:00PM (#807619) Journal

    Is there a prediction (not postdiction) that comes out of this or not?

    Yes.

    Prediction: they will eventually predict that nothing is real.

    --
    The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @11:36PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @11:36PM (#807864)

      Prediction: they will eventually predict that nothing is real.

      Strawberry Fields, forever...