Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday February 27 2019, @12:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the wait-and-see-what-happens dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

US lawmakers kick off debate over online privacy

US lawmakers opened a debate Tuesday over privacy legislation in the first step by Congress toward regulation addressing a series of troublesome data protection abuses by tech firms.

Most companies have said they would accept new federal legislation in the wake of bombshell revelations about Facebook and other online platforms' mishandling of users' personal data.

Lawmakers face several key choices, including whether to adopt the model in the European Union's data protection rules, and whether to pre-empt the strict privacy rules adopted by California.

A House of Representatives committee hearing on Tuesday is to be followed by a Senate panel Wednesday where industry and interest groups will make recommendations on US legislation.

Legislators are likely to find broad agreement on the need for greater transparency regarding the collection and sharing of data, and on tougher enforcement for violations.

Beyond that, sharp differences exist on how tightly tech firms should be reined in.

"A federal law must include basic rights for individuals to access, correct, delete and port their personal data," said Nuala O'Connor, president of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a digital rights group, in testimony prepared for the House Energy and Commerce panel.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @01:56PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @01:56PM (#807594)

    As long as there is one, you have none.
    You shouldn't trust companies, corporations and conglomerates anyway. They are not trustworthy and proved it numerous times, deliberately compromising your privacy/unintentionally leaking your data because of incompetence.
    Just because there are laws doesn't mean they will follow laws, as long as they can lobby and corrupt and function as storefronts of three-letter agencies. Not even talking about possible loopholes and backups.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday February 27 2019, @02:02PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Wednesday February 27 2019, @02:02PM (#807598) Homepage Journal

    You know we're a corporation here at SN, right? The 'PBC' in SoylentNews PBC stands for Public Benefit Corporation. We have a board and a couple of shareholders and everything. Hell, we even exploit unpaid labor.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @07:39PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27 2019, @07:39PM (#807768)

    instead of the government doing it's job to hold companies accountable for fraud and broken laws/contracts (one of the few legitimate functions of government) they claim they need to be rewarded for not doing their jobs with more power. dumb people vote for it every time and the government gets bigger and more powerful.